2021
DOI: 10.1186/s41983-021-00416-y
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Prognostic value of glucose fluctuation in patients undergoing thrombolysis or thrombectomy due to acute ischemic stroke

Abstract: Background Hyperglycemia during acute ischemic stroke is associated with worse outcomes, and this glucose altitude may persist in the initial days. In this study, we investigate the effect of glucose fluctuations in the first 4 days in patients diagnosed with acute ischemic stroke and who underwent ivr-tPA ± interventional thrombectomy or only interventional thrombectomy on stroke prognosis. Study was designed bicentered retrospective case series. Patients older than 18 years were included and … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2024
2024
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 20 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…15 In addition to the D-dimer admission value categorisation, each continuous confounder is categorised into two groups. The categorisation was carried out based on previous study references, namely for Hb (high (≥165 g/L) vs low (<165 g/L)), 16 WBC (high (>0.011 x 10 9 /L) vs low (≤0.011 x 10 9 /L)), 17 PC (high (>450 × 10 9 /L) vs low (≤450 × 10 9 /L)), 18 RBG (high (≥200 mg/ dL) vs low (<200 mg/dL)), 19 PT (high (≥12.3 s) vs low (<12.3 s)), 20 INR (high (>1.1) vs low (≤1.1)), 21 aPTT (high (>40 s) vs low (≤40 s)) 22 and fibrinogen (high (≥400 mg/ dL) vs low (<400 mg/dL)). 23 All confounder categorisations above were based on the in-hospital mortality cut-off in each study.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…15 In addition to the D-dimer admission value categorisation, each continuous confounder is categorised into two groups. The categorisation was carried out based on previous study references, namely for Hb (high (≥165 g/L) vs low (<165 g/L)), 16 WBC (high (>0.011 x 10 9 /L) vs low (≤0.011 x 10 9 /L)), 17 PC (high (>450 × 10 9 /L) vs low (≤450 × 10 9 /L)), 18 RBG (high (≥200 mg/ dL) vs low (<200 mg/dL)), 19 PT (high (≥12.3 s) vs low (<12.3 s)), 20 INR (high (>1.1) vs low (≤1.1)), 21 aPTT (high (>40 s) vs low (≤40 s)) 22 and fibrinogen (high (≥400 mg/ dL) vs low (<400 mg/dL)). 23 All confounder categorisations above were based on the in-hospital mortality cut-off in each study.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%