2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.jnci.2013.10.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Prognostic value of lymph node ratio in node-positive breast cancer in Egyptian patients

Abstract: The analysis of outcome of patients with early breast cancer in Egypt identified the adverse prognostic effects of high tumor grade, ER negativity and intermediate and high LNR on DFS. If the utility of the LNR is validated in other studies, it may replace the use of absolute number of axillary lymph nodes.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
11
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
1
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The value of positive lymph nodes ratio combined with negative lymph node count in prediction of breast cancer survival (8)(9)(10). Since total lymph nodes after axillary lymph node dissection (ALND) are composed of both positive and NLNs.…”
Section: Original Articlementioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The value of positive lymph nodes ratio combined with negative lymph node count in prediction of breast cancer survival (8)(9)(10). Since total lymph nodes after axillary lymph node dissection (ALND) are composed of both positive and NLNs.…”
Section: Original Articlementioning
confidence: 99%
“…In fact, it is impossible that axillary dissection in every patient is of the same extent, so there must exist heterogeneity if we only use positive lymph node number to classify patients with different prognosis. To improve the efficiency of prognostic system in breast cancer, not only positive lymph node number, but also the number of total lymph nodes should be taken into account (8)(9)(10).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To our knowledge, the present report is the first to quantify the anatomic distribution of axillary nodes as well as to determine the metastatic burden by LNR at different levels. Such a ratio is considered to be superior for the measurement of metastatic burden (Vinh-Hung et al, 2009;Elkhodary et al, 2014). In our study, the number of nodes removed was optimal (> 10 nodes in all patients, with a mean value of 22.4 nodes).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 76%
“…All previous studies on axillary node metastases by levels were restricted to positive patients (Veronesi et al, 1987;Khafagy et al, 2011;Elkhodary et al, 2014). In the present report, we included patients with negative nodes.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This has long been demonstrated as perhaps the most important prognostic indicator for disease free survival (Elkhodary et al, 2014;Wiznia et al, 2014;Singletary et al, 2002). More recently, the lymph node ratio (LNR; number of positive lymph nodes divided by the total examined) has been shown to be an alternative means of assessing risk of disease free survival, with some superiority when fewer than 10 lymph nodes are identified within the dissection specimen (Elkhodary et al, 2014;Wiznia et al, 2014;Chagpar, Camp, & Rimm, 2011). While our series did not meet the threshold for statistical significance for LNR association with disease control (p=0.052), this may have been due to the low number of cancer recurrence events.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%