2019
DOI: 10.1155/2019/7386140
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Prognostic Value of Lymphovascular Invasion in Upper Urinary Tract Urothelial Carcinoma after Radical Nephroureterectomy: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Abstract: This study was performed to identify the prognostic impact of lymphovascular invasion (LVI) in patients with upper urinary tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC) after radical nephroureterectomy (RNU). A systematic search in PubMed, Embase, and the Cochrane Library was performed to identify relevant studies. The outcomes of interest, including progression-free survival (PFS), cancer-specific survival (CSS), and overall survival (OS), were extracted, and the pooled hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% confidence intervals (C… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

1
15
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 46 publications
1
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…LVI is defined as the presence of cancer cells within an endothelium‐lined space without underlying muscular walls and is considered an important step in tumour dissemination. In previous studies, LVI has been shown to significantly increase the risk of disease recurrence, cancer‐specific mortality, and overall mortality after RNU [21–23]. However, the association between the incidence of LVI and poor mortality was observed only in patients with node‐negative UTUC and not in patients with node‐positive UTUC.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…LVI is defined as the presence of cancer cells within an endothelium‐lined space without underlying muscular walls and is considered an important step in tumour dissemination. In previous studies, LVI has been shown to significantly increase the risk of disease recurrence, cancer‐specific mortality, and overall mortality after RNU [21–23]. However, the association between the incidence of LVI and poor mortality was observed only in patients with node‐negative UTUC and not in patients with node‐positive UTUC.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 95%
“… 11 , 12 Although many studies have suggested the negative impact of LVI+ on prognosis, it was not included in the inclusion criteria in both clinical trials. 13 , 14 , 15 , 16 , 17 , 18 , 19 We found that more than half of the patients in this cohort had LVI+ or pN+ (very high‐risk) (Figure S4A,D ). In addition, when we simply compared LVI status in the trial‐eligible group, the median DFS was significantly worse in patients with LVI+ than in those with LVI−, which was similar to that of patients with pN+ (Figure S4B,C,E,F ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 87%
“…Of the inclusion criteria of those phase III studies, the patient's lymphovascular invasion (LVI) status was not included in the definition of high‐risk disease. Because LVI status is one of the established pathological risk factors for poor prognosis in patients with UC, 13 , 14 , 15 , 16 , 17 , 18 , 19 we hypothesize that it might play a key role in the selection of potential candidates for adjuvant immunotherapy. Firstly, we evaluate the effect of trial eligibility for adjuvant immunotherapy on prognosis in patients with localized and locally advanced muscle‐invasive bladder carcinoma (MIBC) and upper tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC) in a real‐world practice.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Additionally, we demonstrated the distinct relationship between ASA score and some clinicopathological characteristics, such as age, tumor size, LVI, and AC. Most of these indicators certainly had significant impact on the prognosis of UTUC patients ( 23 26 ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%