2008
DOI: 10.1002/hed.20865
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Prognostic value of primary tumor volume after concurrent chemoradiation with daily low‐dose cisplatin for advanced‐stage head and neck carcinoma

Abstract: In advanced-stage head and neck squamous cell carcinoma treated with concurrent chemoradiation, primary tumor volume is associated with locoregional control and survival. Larger studies are needed to confirm whether incorporation of tumor volume in the staging system improves prediction of treatment outcome and can serve as a tool to guide treatment options.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

1
23
1

Year Published

2010
2010
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 30 publications
(25 citation statements)
references
References 62 publications
1
23
1
Order By: Relevance
“…A larger tumor volume is thought to be a major factor in determining a poor therapeutic outcome [13]. In the present study, there were no differences in the OS and LRC rates between the two groups.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 75%
“…A larger tumor volume is thought to be a major factor in determining a poor therapeutic outcome [13]. In the present study, there were no differences in the OS and LRC rates between the two groups.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 75%
“…Tumor burden is a known predictor of the response to definitive RT (28,29). The T stage represents the primary tumor burden; however, it is not a statistically significant prognostic factor for the PFS.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Induction (neoadjuvant) chemotherapy (IC) could have the potential to reduce the incidence of distant metastases. Furthermore, IC, by downsizing the tumor, could improve local control probability of subsequent definitive concurrent radiochemotherapy (5). However, for locally advanced and unresectable HNC, IC has been evaluated in clinical trials for more than two decades without any consistent proof of benefit.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%