2022
DOI: 10.1097/mej.0000000000000924
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Prognostic value of serial score measurements of the national early warning score, the quick sequential organ failure assessment and the systemic inflammatory response syndrome to predict clinical outcome in early sepsis

Abstract: Background and importance Sepsis is a common and potentially lethal syndrome, and early recognition is critical to prevent deterioration. Yet, currently available scores to facilitate recognition of sepsis lack prognostic accuracy. Objective To identify the optimal time-point to determine NEWS, qSOFA and SIRS for the prediction of clinical deterioration in early sepsis and to determine whether the change in these scores over time improves their prognostic accuracy. … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0
1

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
0
7
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Notably, the time at which vital signs are measured for EWSs determination may affect the discriminatory performance. In a post-hoc study on 1,750 patients with serial vital sign measurements every 30 min during the first 4 h in the ED, Zonneveld et al [45] reported that the AUROC of NEWS for sepsis prediction (Sepsis-3 definition) at triage was 0.62, compared with 0.60 for qSOFA and 0.59 for SIRS. The AUROC was generally higher at 1 h and 150 min after triage.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Notably, the time at which vital signs are measured for EWSs determination may affect the discriminatory performance. In a post-hoc study on 1,750 patients with serial vital sign measurements every 30 min during the first 4 h in the ED, Zonneveld et al [45] reported that the AUROC of NEWS for sepsis prediction (Sepsis-3 definition) at triage was 0.62, compared with 0.60 for qSOFA and 0.59 for SIRS. The AUROC was generally higher at 1 h and 150 min after triage.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Broadly speaking, we considered two types of score: generic scores-systems (NEWS2, MREMS, or ViEWS) applicable across all acute illnesses [17][18][19][20], which included RAPS, derived from the Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation II and customized for use in ambulance services; specific scores for particular conditions [21], such as CART, used in cardiovascular pathology, TEWS for trauma and injuries pathologies, and qSOFA, employed for patients with presumed infection in order to identify misleading cases of sepsis [22].…”
Section: Main Findingsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In contrast to patients without SIRS, patients who develop it are more likely to be admitted to the ICU, to require a higher level of care and to experience a higher mortality rate at 28 days. 4 , 5 , 6 Sepsis is the primary cause of death from infection, which mortality reaches levels of 25%–30% and increases with the shock and multiorgan failure progression. 1 , 7 This makes SIRS be among the most common causes of mortality.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%