2010
DOI: 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2010.01.025
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Prognostic value of the calling criteria in patients receiving a medical emergency team review

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
30
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 38 publications
(32 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
2
30
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This may be due to several factors including improved ratio of staff during the day, different vital sign routines during the day compared with the night, concern about disturbing patients at night, as well as the availability of the primary teams who are familiar with the patient's baseline status, and therefore recognize deterioration. Several other studies have also noted a similar circadian pattern of RRT activation, with fewer calls between midnight and 6 am (24,25).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 57%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…This may be due to several factors including improved ratio of staff during the day, different vital sign routines during the day compared with the night, concern about disturbing patients at night, as well as the availability of the primary teams who are familiar with the patient's baseline status, and therefore recognize deterioration. Several other studies have also noted a similar circadian pattern of RRT activation, with fewer calls between midnight and 6 am (24,25).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 57%
“…Median (IQR) Charlson scores were also the same in the no-delay and delay groups. CART scores differed, with those in the no-delay group having a median (IQR) CART score of 9 (4-17) versus a median CART score of 13 (8)(9)(10)(11)(12)(13)(14)(15)(16)(17)(18)(19)(20)(21)(22)(23)(24) for those with a delay.…”
Section: Full Cohortmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In a study of 1051 RRT calls in a Brazilian hospital, only 8.4% of calls had a DNR/NFR order, approximately one-third of which were written after the RRT call [31]. A study of three Canadian teaching hospitals revealed that 8.9% of RRT consults had a prior LOMT.…”
Section: The Emergence Of End-of-life Care Issues In Rapid Response Tmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A retrospective single centre study from Brazil reported the prognostic value of calling criteria in patients receiving a medical emergency team (MET) review. 11 There were 1051 calls for 901 ward patients and 423 (46.9%) died within 30 days. The authors comment on this worrying high mortality that could be caused by delays in activating the MET team.…”
Section: Identification Of the Deteriorating Patient And Prevention Omentioning
confidence: 99%