2018
DOI: 10.1200/jco.2018.36.15_suppl.e12629
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Prognostic value of the interval between the last neoadjuvant chemotherapy (CT) administration and breast surgery: Preliminary data of the NeoBracer international observational study.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Eight systematic reviews, four studies on metastatic breast cancer, and eleven non-neoadjuvant chemotherapy were further excluded. Eventually, nine articles [11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19] (eight studies) were identi ed as eligible for our analysis, including eight independent studies for OS, six studies for RFS, and two for DFS [14]. The ow chart of the literature search and study selection is shown in Fig.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Eight systematic reviews, four studies on metastatic breast cancer, and eleven non-neoadjuvant chemotherapy were further excluded. Eventually, nine articles [11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19] (eight studies) were identi ed as eligible for our analysis, including eight independent studies for OS, six studies for RFS, and two for DFS [14]. The ow chart of the literature search and study selection is shown in Fig.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Data synthesis:A total of four hundred and ve potentially relevant publications were found according to our initial search strategy,one hundred and sixteen publications from PubMed/Medline,two hundred and eighty-nine publications from Embase.There were three hundred and one publications after duplicate publications were removed;of these,we excluded two hundred and sixty-eight articles because the title or abstract did not meet the eligibility criteria.Eight systematic reviews,four studies on metastatic breast cancer,and eleven non-neoadjuvant chemotherapy were further excluded. Eventually,nine studies were identi ed as eligible for our analysis,including nine independent studies for OS [11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19],six studies for RFS [11,12,[15][16][17][18],and three for DFS [13,14,19].The ow chart of the literature search and study selection is shown in gure 1. Subsequently,subgroup analysis was performed based on different time intervals.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%