2008
DOI: 10.1177/0145482x0810200205
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Program Accountability for Students who are Visually Impaired

Abstract: Administrators across the country are collecting and analyzing program and studentspecific data to meet the requirements of the No Child Left Behind Act ( 2001), Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (2004), and state performance plans. Although most states are not required to disaggregate data for students who are visually impaired (that is, those who are blind or have low vision), educational programs that serve this population are mandated to analyze these data for the effectiveness of programs. One s… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 1 publication
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In 2013, the Service Intensity Subcommittee of the Texas Action Committee for the Education of Students with Visual Impairments (a Texas Education Agency-endorsed stakeholder group tasked with ensuring appropriate educational services for students who are blind/vision impaired) carefully examined available service determination tools (Toelle and Blankenship, 2008;Durkel and Miller, 2009; Michigan Department of Education, 2017) and found these tools lacked the guidance needed to determine service type, time, and intensity recommendations. The tools either did not address all skill areas related to individual needs or included aspects unrelated to student need (e.g., practitioner's workload, material preparation, and travel).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In 2013, the Service Intensity Subcommittee of the Texas Action Committee for the Education of Students with Visual Impairments (a Texas Education Agency-endorsed stakeholder group tasked with ensuring appropriate educational services for students who are blind/vision impaired) carefully examined available service determination tools (Toelle and Blankenship, 2008;Durkel and Miller, 2009; Michigan Department of Education, 2017) and found these tools lacked the guidance needed to determine service type, time, and intensity recommendations. The tools either did not address all skill areas related to individual needs or included aspects unrelated to student need (e.g., practitioner's workload, material preparation, and travel).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%