2004
DOI: 10.1080/02602930410001689162
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Program assessment and program improvement: closing the loop

Abstract: Engineering Criteria 2000 (EC 2000), the recently revised set of accreditation criteria for engineering programs in the US, places considerable stress on outcomes assessments. EC 2000 requires the assessment results to be used to identify program improvements, and for such usage and the resulting improvements to be documented.While numerous assessment instruments have been developed and discussed in the literature, less attention has been paid to the question of how to use these to improve the programs or to d… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
5
1
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As part of the teaching-learning-assessment cycle, review of the efficacy of program modifications and corrective measure is necessary (Soundarajan 2004). Indeed, by assessing outcomes of our students in their careers, we not only monitor student learning, but encourage and shape the type of learning desired of our future students by academia and industry (Huba and Freed 2000).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As part of the teaching-learning-assessment cycle, review of the efficacy of program modifications and corrective measure is necessary (Soundarajan 2004). Indeed, by assessing outcomes of our students in their careers, we not only monitor student learning, but encourage and shape the type of learning desired of our future students by academia and industry (Huba and Freed 2000).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This 'closing the loop' (Coyle and Powney, 1990) stage of the model has become important to business schools as evidence of quality improvement mechanisms necessary for funding and accreditation purposes (Martell, 2007). Effectively completing this stage not only allows for improving the curriculum but also helps new students and faculty understand the structure and evolution of the course (Soundarajan, 2004).…”
Section: Feedback and 'Closing The Loop'mentioning
confidence: 98%
“…15 Implementing a successful feedback loop for assessment was important. 27 In one report, student selfassessments regarding preparation to enter practice was highest in the country following significant curricular reform, and these positive data helped sustain change.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…18 Soundarajan described a Course Group Report, used to gather information from course instructors about data collected and subsequent changes made to courses. 27 4. Communicate the vision.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%