Programmatic Risk Analysis for Critical Engineering Systems Under Tight Resource Constraints

Abstract

Managers of complex engineering development projects face a challenge when deciding how to allocate scarce resources to minimize the risks of project failure. As resource constraints become tighter, balancing these failure risks is more critical, less intuitive, and can benefit from the power of quantitative analysis. This paper describes the Advanced Programmatic Risk Analysis and Management model (APRAM), a decision-support framework for the management of the risk of failures of dependent engineering projects within programs. Our goal is to guide the management of the design, the development, and the budget of dependent projects. Considering first a single project, our approach is to optimize the use of the budget reserves and of the funds dedicated to the system itself for each possible budget allocation. This phase involves separate optimizations of the system design and a strategy for resolving development problems based on a chosen objective function. The model also allows checking that specified thresholds of maximum acceptable risks are met, and if not, indicates how much is required to satisfy them. It is then extended to include project dependencies within a program. Finally, it allows checking that the level of resources available is appropriate by computing the shadow "risk cost" of the budget constraint. The NASA Jet Propulsion Laboratory has supported the development of this model, so each step of APRAM is illustrated by the schematic case of an unmanned space program involving two dependent projects. Also, where applicable, we discuss our experiences working with the APRAM concepts for the management of unmanned space missions.

Static and dynamic resource allocation models for recovery of interdependent systems: application to the Deepwater Horizon oil spill

“…Guikema and Paté-Cornell (2002) develop an optimization problem in which several components can be upgraded, and the alternatives are whether or not to select a component for upgrading and how much money to spend on upgrading the component. A two-period model (Dillon et al 2003) examines a problem for NASA where a decision maker minimizes the technical risk of an exploration spacecraft in the first period and allocates the remainder of the budget to minimize the risk of failure during the development phase. A dynamic model (Dillon et al 2005) extends this two-period model by allowing the decision maker to allocate resources at different points in time to improve reliability.…”

Identification and assessment of hazard in the Refractory Brick Production Company of Gonabad, Iran, using the hazard and operability technique

“…For instance, this issue has been stressed in risk assessment and management as one of the key elements of the Health and Safety Executive. The first step in the process of risk management and assessment is to identify hazards and their effects (5). In this regard, several techniques have been presented, each with their own specific capabilities and limitations, to contribute to the process of identifying hazards and assessing their effects.…”

Is carbon a realistic choice for ITER's divertor?

“…Operations research has been applied to optimally managing risks and there is an extensive literature, for example [9,10,11] that has applied mathematical modelling to minimise risk. Risk management in a large scale research project poses additional challenges but also opportunities.…”