2012
DOI: 10.1179/1757092112z.0000000004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Programming challenges of sampling controls to cases from the dynamic risk sets in nested case–control studies

Abstract: Pharmacoepidemiological studies based on the cohort design are simpler to analyse and their results easier to interpret. However, these may not reflect real-life drug use which is a major strength of such studies. The nested case-control design is often used instead to avoid the computational burden associated with time-dependent explanatory variables. Unlike the classical case-control design which is generally easy to programme, that of the nested case-control can pose a number of challenges. Subjects can be … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This nonexposed group consisted of 4 participants per stroke case, randomly matched to this case on age (within 1 year), sex, and visiting the same examination round, using an incidence density sampling approach. 30 This nonexposed group was free of stroke until the stroke date of their matched case (index date) and their at-risk time for mortality started at the index date. Note that participants could be included as nonexposed several times and could become exposed later on.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This nonexposed group consisted of 4 participants per stroke case, randomly matched to this case on age (within 1 year), sex, and visiting the same examination round, using an incidence density sampling approach. 30 This nonexposed group was free of stroke until the stroke date of their matched case (index date) and their at-risk time for mortality started at the index date. Note that participants could be included as nonexposed several times and could become exposed later on.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Then, we selected per stroke patient, 4 participants without stroke, randomly matched to this patient on age (± 1 year), sex, and visiting the same examination round, using an incidence density sampling approach. 2 Participants without stroke were free of stroke at the stroke date of their matched stroke patient (index date) and their time at risk of stroke and dementia was from this index date onwards. Persons could be included as a non-exposed match for multiple stroke patients, and could become exposed themselves later on.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, it should be noted that path sampling (by design) is based on more unique controls selected [ 11 ] implying that it naturally uses a larger sample of unique patients to achieve those similar standard errors as compared to incidence density sampling. This knowledge gained is directly useful in improving nested case-control studies that have recently gained an interest in safety studies[ 26 , 27 ]. This study provides insights regarding choice of nested case-control design and the burden of AEs on treatment non-adherence and study non-completion in IPTp trials.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%