1972
DOI: 10.1901/jaba.1972.5-209
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

PROGRAMMING GENERALIZATION AND MAINTENANCE OF TREATMENT EFFECTS ACROSS TIME AND ACROSS SETTINGS1

Abstract: Effects of three experimental and one control strategy were investigated in facilitating generalization and maintenance of treatment effects after two months in a token-economy classroom. At the conclusion of treatment, subjects were randomly assigned to one of three maintenance strategies or a control group and returned to their regular classrooms. The maintenance strategies were peer reprogramming, equating stimulus conditions between the experimental and regular classrooms, and teacher training in behavior … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

4
53
0

Year Published

1975
1975
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 135 publications
(57 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
4
53
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Sarah was never appointed to direct an invitation to Amanda or to prompt her peers to direct an invitation. The results of this study relate to that literature concerned with maintenance strategies (e.g., Fowler & Baer, 1981;Walker & Buckley, 1972), group-oriented contingenices (e.g., Greenwood & Hops, 1981), peer reciprocity (e.g., Strain & Shores, 1977), and the peer entrapment effect (e.g., Baer & Wolf, 1970 Finally, the specific function of peer reciprocity must be darified. The results of this investigation only suggest that reciprocal peer invitations maintained the target children's play offers and requests over time.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 69%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Sarah was never appointed to direct an invitation to Amanda or to prompt her peers to direct an invitation. The results of this study relate to that literature concerned with maintenance strategies (e.g., Fowler & Baer, 1981;Walker & Buckley, 1972), group-oriented contingenices (e.g., Greenwood & Hops, 1981), peer reciprocity (e.g., Strain & Shores, 1977), and the peer entrapment effect (e.g., Baer & Wolf, 1970 Finally, the specific function of peer reciprocity must be darified. The results of this investigation only suggest that reciprocal peer invitations maintained the target children's play offers and requests over time.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 69%
“…Despite this accomplishment, researchers have not always demonstrated the generalization and maintenance of social behavior (e.g., Berler, Gross, & Drabman, 1982;Herman & Tramontana, 1971;Strain, Kerr, & Ragland, 1981;Strain & Timm, 1974;Van Hasselt, Hersen, Whitehill, & Bellack, 1979; Warren, Baer, & Rogers-Warren, 1979 the focus of recent research efforts (e.g., Fowler & Baer, 1981;Paine et al, 1982;Stokes & Baer, 1976;Stokes, Baer, & Jackson, 1974; Stokes, Fowler, & Baer, 1978;Timm, Strain, & Eller, 1979;Walker & Buckley, 1972). Baer and Wolf (1970) noted that natural communities of peer reinforcement may be one solution to the generalization problem.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…There is little evidence to date, however, that gains made in special education programs are con- sistently transferred to regular classroom settings. Typically, when handicapped students are removed from their regular classrooms for treatment in resource rooms or other special education settings, they exhibit academic and behavioral improvements in the special education settings but do not maintain the improvements after returning to their regular classrooms (Walker & Buckley, 1972;Wildman & Wildman, 1975).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The IPPB study was carried out in the treatment room of the hospital. This setting was chosen, because, as pointed out by Walker and Buckley (1972), subject-specific behaviors are partly a function of stimulus similarity existing across settings. Thus, using the treatment room for IPPB training was an attempt to maximize generalization of training to the treatment situation.…”
Section: Subjects and Settingmentioning
confidence: 99%