2010
DOI: 10.1097/01.hj.0000388538.27405.93
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Programming hearing instruments to make live music more enjoyable

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The effects of hearing aid processing on musical signals and the perception of music have received very little attention in research (Hockley, Bahlmann & Chasin, 2010;Wessel, Fitz, Battenberg, Schmeder & Edwards, 2007) although listeners with a hearing loss are no less interested in music than normal-hearing listeners. Every person is immersed in an environment filled with sound, and being able to understand speech is not the only function of hearing.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The effects of hearing aid processing on musical signals and the perception of music have received very little attention in research (Hockley, Bahlmann & Chasin, 2010;Wessel, Fitz, Battenberg, Schmeder & Edwards, 2007) although listeners with a hearing loss are no less interested in music than normal-hearing listeners. Every person is immersed in an environment filled with sound, and being able to understand speech is not the only function of hearing.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The improvement was evident in the subjective assessment by a group of musicians who had previously rejected digital processing hearing instruments in favor of an analog instrument. As tested by Hockley et al (2010), the judgments of sound quality revealed that when wearing digital hearing instruments, these musicians preferred a program with the level-shift engaged for live music.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is important to determine if subjective improvements can be found when the level-shift in the front end for higher input levels is implemented and used by individuals, who had reported previous poor experience with digital hearing instruments. Hockley et al (2010) conducted a study which looked at the ratings of sound quality attributes by 9 professional musicians (8 males and 1 female). Four of these musicians were woodwind players (clarinet, saxophone, and flute); 3 played jazz, while the other was a classical musician.…”
Section: Experience With a Hearing Instrument Utilizing The Input Levmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To ensure that it was identification abilities being assessed and not musical knowledge, participants' familiarity with the melodies was verified before testing [19]. Participants were given an alphabetical list of the melodies and were instructed to mark all the melodies that were familiar to them.…”
Section: Sub-test 11mentioning
confidence: 99%