2020
DOI: 10.1080/0020739x.2020.1736349
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Programming in mathematics education

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
31
0
1

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
4
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 34 publications
(32 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
0
31
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Studies of constructionism at higher-level mathematics education show how programming supports students' understanding of mathematical concepts (e.g., Leron & Dubinsky, 1995;Wilensky, 1995) and how it contributes to the development of critical thinking skills (e.g., Abrahamson et al, 2006;Marshall, 2012). Kaufmann and Stenseth (2020) demonstrate in a case study, lower secondary school-level pupils use programming to solve a mathematical problem.…”
Section: )mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Studies of constructionism at higher-level mathematics education show how programming supports students' understanding of mathematical concepts (e.g., Leron & Dubinsky, 1995;Wilensky, 1995) and how it contributes to the development of critical thinking skills (e.g., Abrahamson et al, 2006;Marshall, 2012). Kaufmann and Stenseth (2020) demonstrate in a case study, lower secondary school-level pupils use programming to solve a mathematical problem.…”
Section: )mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…: This circular process suggests that students might even be able to iteratively cycle through this process as they work toward increased understanding and a better-working program. There is a striking resemblance to the cycle depicted in p. 15 of (Kaufmann & Stenseth, 2020), where "Use mathematics" and "Make hypothesis" could be interpreted as Math, "Change program" and "Test" as Code, and "Observe and analyse" as Output. In Case A and Case C, then, we have seen possible extensions to Kaufmann and Stenseth's model.…”
Section: Summary Of Casesmentioning
confidence: 76%
“…Text-based programming had been categorized as a difficult programming task for students because it is using programming languages such as Java, C+, C++, and C#. ME-CoT Module is developed using a text-based programming tool (Visual Studio with the C# programming language) because kids are already familiar with block-based programming (Scratch) from primary school ( Haslina et al, 2018 ; Kaufmann and Stenseth, 2021 ). ME-CoT Visual Studio has been crafted using Visual Studio which is user-friendly and well.…”
Section: Module Developmentmentioning
confidence: 99%