2022
DOI: 10.48130/fr-2022-0006
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Progress and challenges in applying CRISPR/Cas techniques to the genome editing of trees

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3
1
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 99 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, this strategy seems not efficient for lincRNA, as the transcriptional level of PRIR1 could be suppressed in none of all 5 independent transgenic lines of PRIR1-RNAi (Supporting Information: Figure 5). Further CRISPR/Cas techniques should be applied to knock out PRIR1 (Pak & Li, 2022). In any case, the PRIR1 overexpression results suggested that PRIR1 may function in promoting bud break in hybrid aspen.…”
Section: Identification Of New Regulators Mediating Seasonal Growthmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, this strategy seems not efficient for lincRNA, as the transcriptional level of PRIR1 could be suppressed in none of all 5 independent transgenic lines of PRIR1-RNAi (Supporting Information: Figure 5). Further CRISPR/Cas techniques should be applied to knock out PRIR1 (Pak & Li, 2022). In any case, the PRIR1 overexpression results suggested that PRIR1 may function in promoting bud break in hybrid aspen.…”
Section: Identification Of New Regulators Mediating Seasonal Growthmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Method optimization [127] The polyethylene glycol (PEG)-mediated delivery method has also been employed in fruit tree genome-editing systems (Table 1) since it is especially useful for these species where the production of transgenic plants is very slow [128]. This CRISPR/Cas delivery method has been proposed as a good strategy to produce transgene-free edited plants by delivering ribonucleoprotein [127].…”
Section: Ph5mentioning
confidence: 99%