2008
DOI: 10.1051/vetres:2008009
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Progress and limits of TSE diagnostic tools

Abstract: -Following the two "mad cow" crises of 1996 and 2000, there was an urgent need for rapid and sensitive diagnostic methods to identify animals infected with the bovine spongiform encephalopathy (BSE) agent. This stimulated research in the field of prion diagnosis and led to the establishment of numerous so-called "rapid tests" which have been in use in Europe since 2001 for monitoring at-risk populations (rendering plants) and animals slaughtered for human consumption (slaughterhouse). These rapid tests have pl… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
46
0
5

Year Published

2009
2009
2013
2013

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 48 publications
(51 citation statements)
references
References 84 publications
(93 reference statements)
0
46
0
5
Order By: Relevance
“…BSE cases identified between 2001 and 2007 in all three BSE surveillance streams (clinical surveillance, risk animals and healthy slaughter animals) were used. All positives were confirmed at the Member States' National Reference Laboratories using validated tests (OIE Manual of Diagnostic Tests and Vaccines for Terrestrial Animals Chapter 2.4.6) [19,20]. Data from the three surveillance streams were merged to facilitate comparison between countries based on the assumption that the surveillance streams varied little among countries (with the exception of the UK with mainly clinical surveillance) and that rapid tests for BSE are detecting infected animals close to onset of clinical disease.…”
Section: Datamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…BSE cases identified between 2001 and 2007 in all three BSE surveillance streams (clinical surveillance, risk animals and healthy slaughter animals) were used. All positives were confirmed at the Member States' National Reference Laboratories using validated tests (OIE Manual of Diagnostic Tests and Vaccines for Terrestrial Animals Chapter 2.4.6) [19,20]. Data from the three surveillance streams were merged to facilitate comparison between countries based on the assumption that the surveillance streams varied little among countries (with the exception of the UK with mainly clinical surveillance) and that rapid tests for BSE are detecting infected animals close to onset of clinical disease.…”
Section: Datamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The presence of PrP res is considered to be pathognomonic of prion diseases and correlates with the presence of infectivity. All attempts to develop a diagnosis assay based on the direct detection of PrP res in blood have failed (20). The minute amount of TSE agent in blood is the most likely explanation for this failure; however, an alternative explanation is that the TSE agent in blood is associated with PK-sensitive PrP species (16).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…five kDa) of the PrP c , due to the partial degradation of the N-terminal part of the protein. 28 Immunohistochemical analysis detected intense cellular-specific PrP C staining in neurons, thymocytes and lymphocytes. PrP C was also detected in the enteric wall, pancreatic islets of Langerhans, myocardium, pulmonary alveolar sacs, renal glomeruli, and dermal epithelial cells.…”
Section: Prion Volume 7 Issuementioning
confidence: 99%
“…31 The animal infection is too laborious and time-consuming to be used for routine high-throughput screening. 28 . It has to be noted that none of these tests is able to identify infected animal at the pre-symptomatic stage and therefore the risk of the infectious agents entering the food chain is not completely eliminated.…”
Section: Prion Volume 7 Issuementioning
confidence: 99%