2022
DOI: 10.1038/s41416-022-02045-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Progress and priorities in reducing the time to cancer diagnosis

Abstract: Key developments in early diagnosis research and policy since the publication of the highly cited BJC review “Is increased time to diagnosis and treatment associated with poorer outcomes?” by Neal et al. in 2015 are summarised. Progress achieved since 2015 is described and priorities for further research identified.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It is reassuring that within two UK populations of cancer patients, overall consultation patterns and recording of alarm symptoms and blood tests were broadly similar in the year before the diagnosis, indirectly cross-validating the usefulness of both sources for symptom-based research on cancer diagnosis. However, it is also concerning that on average there was a nearly two-fold difference in the frequency of recording of non-alarm symptoms, because predictive value estimates of such symptoms (for cancer) may be susceptible to bias, and because their accurate estimation is a research priority [38,39]. The potential direction of bias is hard to infer in advance of…”
Section: Interpretation and Implicationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is reassuring that within two UK populations of cancer patients, overall consultation patterns and recording of alarm symptoms and blood tests were broadly similar in the year before the diagnosis, indirectly cross-validating the usefulness of both sources for symptom-based research on cancer diagnosis. However, it is also concerning that on average there was a nearly two-fold difference in the frequency of recording of non-alarm symptoms, because predictive value estimates of such symptoms (for cancer) may be susceptible to bias, and because their accurate estimation is a research priority [38,39]. The potential direction of bias is hard to infer in advance of…”
Section: Interpretation and Implicationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, benign or malignant nodules (e.g., thyroid nodules or lung nodules) are often inconclusive even with imaging examination and require further confirmation by invasive biopsy. Since delayed diagnosis leads to delayed treatments and a poorer prognosis ( Aden et al, 2022 ; Barrios, 2022 ; Lone et al, 2022 ; Nicholson and Lyratzopoulos, 2023 ), detection of cancer-related biomarkers in a simple blood draw is the most important strategy for early detection and early treatment of cancer. Therefore, liquid biopsy is a recent trend in cancer screening and management ( Handa et al, 2021 ; Lone et al, 2022 ) as it can quickly determine the levels of specific cancer-related biomarkers in body fluids, especially blood.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Specialised rapid diagnostic clinics to investigate for cancer at multiple sites and to explain symptoms 10,11 have already been introduced in some countries. Now, better tools that assist GPs with identifying patients with a high clinical suspicion of cancer are urgently needed [12][13][14][15] .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%