2013
DOI: 10.1016/j.jmr.2012.11.015
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Progress and promises of human cardiac magnetic resonance at ultrahigh fields: A physics perspective

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
69
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

6
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 59 publications
(69 citation statements)
references
References 78 publications
0
69
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In addition to SNR gains and phase noise reduction at UHF (111)(112)(113), improvements are expected by using local multi-channel receive arrays for MR thermometry which demonstrated major SNR benefits over the use of the traditional RF body coil approach and are clinical routine (B0 ≤ 3.0T) (98,(114)(115)(116).…”
Section: Integrated Systems or Thermal Mrmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition to SNR gains and phase noise reduction at UHF (111)(112)(113), improvements are expected by using local multi-channel receive arrays for MR thermometry which demonstrated major SNR benefits over the use of the traditional RF body coil approach and are clinical routine (B0 ≤ 3.0T) (98,(114)(115)(116).…”
Section: Integrated Systems or Thermal Mrmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…More than 35.000 7.0 Tesla MR research examinations (1) have already been performed globally, producing valuable data that indicate the value of ultrahigh fields (2)(3)(4)(5)(6)(7)(8). Even if these instruments do not become standard tools in the everyday clinical setting in the very near future, the invaluable new insights they are providing into (patho)physiological processes will be helpful to patients everywhere.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Realizing the intrinsic sensitivity gain at higher magnetic field strengths (15)(16)(17)(18)(19)(20)(21)(22)(23)(24), 23 Na MRI at B 0 =7.0 T is conceptually appealing to enhance spatial resolution. We reasoned that at 7.0 T, the capabilities to assess Na+ in skin would provide more precision in estimating skin Na + content.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%