2012
DOI: 10.1002/mats.201200030
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Progress in Computer Simulation of Bulk, Confined, and Surface‐initiated Polymerizations

Abstract: In this article we provide a brief summary of computational techniques applied to investigate polymerization reactions in general, with a focus on systems under confinement and initiated from surfaces. We concentrate on two major classes of techniques, i.e., stochastic methods and molecular modeling. We describe the major principles of the two classes of methodologies and point out their strengths and weaknesses. We review a variety of studies from the literature and conclude with an outlook of these two class… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
27
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(27 citation statements)
references
References 182 publications
(221 reference statements)
0
27
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In addition, the determination of σ chains is usually more onerous than measuring the (average) molar mass [ 14 , 42 ], therefore making it more difficult to access detailed experimental information on the conformations of the surface-tethered polymer chains. In contrast, experimental analysis of the chains in solution is relatively straightforward but not recommended [ 15 , 42 , 43 , 44 ], as the kinetics for chain formation in the solution and on the surface are completely different, due to a very strong impact of confinement effects exerted by the presence of the surface. For example, the likelihood that two active chains at the surface can terminate with each other is much lower than if those two chains are free in the solution, as conceptually illustrated in Figure 2 (bottom).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, the determination of σ chains is usually more onerous than measuring the (average) molar mass [ 14 , 42 ], therefore making it more difficult to access detailed experimental information on the conformations of the surface-tethered polymer chains. In contrast, experimental analysis of the chains in solution is relatively straightforward but not recommended [ 15 , 42 , 43 , 44 ], as the kinetics for chain formation in the solution and on the surface are completely different, due to a very strong impact of confinement effects exerted by the presence of the surface. For example, the likelihood that two active chains at the surface can terminate with each other is much lower than if those two chains are free in the solution, as conceptually illustrated in Figure 2 (bottom).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, statistical arguments are used in Section for the “equireactive” case (all reaction rates are identical) to derive analytical expressions for the number and weight average molar mass of the reaction products. The Monte‐Carlo simulations allow to compute the molar mass distribution of the full sample and specific weight distributions of particular moieties can be analyzed. We use these to derive moiety specific degrees of polymerization as molecules with or without a particular type of moiety may be separated out of the reaction bath or may dominate the molar mass as in ref.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The conformation of the polymer brush is mainly governed by the interplay between Mn and the grafting density (σ p ) . σ p is difficult to determine directly; however, it can be calculated by using the known values of dry polymer thickness ( h p ) and M n :σp=NA ρ hpMnIn Equation , N A is Avogadro's number and ρ is the bulk density of the polymer.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%