2016
DOI: 10.9745/ghsp-d-16-00004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Progress in Harmonizing Tiered HIV Laboratory Systems: Challenges and Opportunities in 8 African Countries

Abstract: Countries have had mixed results in adhering to laboratory instrument procurement lists, with some limiting instrument brand expansion and others experiencing substantial growth in instrument counts and brand diversity. Important challenges to advancing laboratory harmonization strategies include:Lack of adherence to procurement policiesLack of an effective coordinating bodyMisalignment of laboratory policies, treatment guidelines, and minimum service packages

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Subsequently, 262 and 16 articles were also excluded following abstract and full screening respectively. Reasons for the exclusion after full article screening were: one study was not conducted in a LMIC [27], two studies reported no evidence of both supply chain management or the primary outcomes of this study [28–30]; four studies reported no information for POC diagnostics [31–34]; three studies had undefined study setting [3537] and; five studies reported laboratory-based POC testing [3842]. In all, 15 studies met the study eligibility criteria for data extraction including one study identified following an updated searched.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Subsequently, 262 and 16 articles were also excluded following abstract and full screening respectively. Reasons for the exclusion after full article screening were: one study was not conducted in a LMIC [27], two studies reported no evidence of both supply chain management or the primary outcomes of this study [28–30]; four studies reported no information for POC diagnostics [31–34]; three studies had undefined study setting [3537] and; five studies reported laboratory-based POC testing [3842]. In all, 15 studies met the study eligibility criteria for data extraction including one study identified following an updated searched.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…67 Point-of-care (POC) instruments have the potential to be used at birth or later for infant diagnosis per recent WHO guidelines. Though POC instruments require unique maintenance, reagents, and provider training, 68 , 69 field evaluations have shown that POC instruments are feasible for use in infant diagnosis, 70 – 73 where they increase infant retention in care. 74 When coupled with effective clinical and community linkage processes, POC infant testing promises to increase access to testing and improvements in retention among those diagnosed.…”
Section: Strategies To Protect and Build On Pmtct Gainsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The lessons for VL deployment are to start testing programs by placing devices with appropriate capacity at each testing location. For example, placing high throughput instruments at central test demand locations and lower throughput devices at smaller sites with robust sample referral linkages that maximize instrument utilization and therefore, the return on the investment made for each instrument . This requires data on testing current and projected needs across the network of health facilities, the mapping of sample referral routes, and coordinated national instrument procurement and deployment plans .…”
Section: Improve Testing Efficiencymentioning
confidence: 99%