2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.ppnp.2017.10.002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Progress in high-energy cosmic ray physics

Abstract: We review some of the recent progress in our knowledge about high-energy cosmic rays, with an emphasis on the interpretation of the different observational results. We discuss the effects that are relevant to shape the cosmic ray spectrum and the explanations proposed to account for its features and for the observed changes in composition. The physics of air-showers is summarized and we also present the results obtained on the proton-air cross section and on the muon content of the showers. We discuss the cosm… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
81
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 62 publications
(82 citation statements)
references
References 173 publications
(245 reference statements)
1
81
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Recent reviews which provide additional details on ultrahigh energy cosmic rays, in particular their mass composition and source candidates, are Refs. [43,44]. Some historical background can be found in Refs.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recent reviews which provide additional details on ultrahigh energy cosmic rays, in particular their mass composition and source candidates, are Refs. [43,44]. Some historical background can be found in Refs.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, photodisintegration for the heavier elements (see the curve segments corresponding to UHECR energies in Fig. 1 of [51]) and pair production for protons [54] both set the maximum distance to the sources of the highest energy UHECRs at around 1Gpc (i.e., the sources should be within the local universe), but this does not prevent CRs originating further out from reaching us altogether. Photodisintegration does not reduce the Lorentz factors of the composite nuclei that it breaks up, so the CRs from cosmological sources ( 1Gpc) will all turn into ultra-relativistic protons, which will also become partially energydepleted through the pair production effect until their energies fall to around 5EeV, below which the pair production attenuation length rises to tens of Gpc (see Fig.…”
Section: Compositionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Photodisintegration does not reduce the Lorentz factors of the composite nuclei that it breaks up, so the CRs from cosmological sources ( 1Gpc) will all turn into ultra-relativistic protons, which will also become partially energydepleted through the pair production effect until their energies fall to around 5EeV, below which the pair production attenuation length rises to tens of Gpc (see Fig. 8 of [54]; and also discussions therein along similar lines, although it is the enhanced photodisintegration at EM-active sources that was envisioned there). Consequently, cosmological sources could possibly provide the (extra-galactic) pure proton injection necessary to explain the ankle feature in the UHECR spectrum (at around 5EeV), as required by the dip model [55,56].…”
Section: Compositionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Cosmic rays, dominantly protons and heavier atomic nuclei, arrive at earth with an energy that spans some 12 orders of magnitude, from a few hundred MeV (10 8 eV) to 100 EeV (10 20 eV) [106][107][108], 16 30. Cosmic rays Measurements of flux with air shower experiments in the knee region differ by as much as a factor of two, indicative of systematic uncertainties in interpretation of the data.…”
Section: Basic Principles Of Cosmic Ray Detectionmentioning
confidence: 99%