1983
DOI: 10.1016/0167-5087(83)90108-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Progress in particle identification by ionization sampling

Abstract: The present generation of large scale dE/dx detectors was conceived in the mid-seventies. In fixed target physics applications (EPI, ISIS) the achieved particle identification efficiency allows for ¢r/K separation in the relativistic rise region. In the family of compact colliding beam detectors (e.g. AFS, ARGUS, CLEO, JADE, TPC, UAI), only the LBL TPC performance was so far sufficient for operation beyond the minimum of ionization. New central detectors foreseen for experiments in near future (LEP) should be … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

1
2
0

Year Published

1985
1985
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
1
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The excellent PID capability over a large momentum range via the measurement of the specific ionization dE/dx is a key feature of the ALICE TPC. In events with low particle multiplicity, a dE/dx resolution better than 5% has been achieved which is consistent with simulations [149] and empirical parametrizations [152,153]. GEM detectors feature a local energy resolution which is similar to that of a MWPC and therefore impose no principal limitation on the achievable dE/dx resolution in a large-scale detector.…”
Section: De/dx Resolutionsupporting
confidence: 79%
“…The excellent PID capability over a large momentum range via the measurement of the specific ionization dE/dx is a key feature of the ALICE TPC. In events with low particle multiplicity, a dE/dx resolution better than 5% has been achieved which is consistent with simulations [149] and empirical parametrizations [152,153]. GEM detectors feature a local energy resolution which is similar to that of a MWPC and therefore impose no principal limitation on the achievable dE/dx resolution in a large-scale detector.…”
Section: De/dx Resolutionsupporting
confidence: 79%
“…There is no "magic gas" choice which can alter these basic require ments. This can be shown either empirically, 8 or using a Monte Carlo calculation, 9 or using a phenomenological calculation. 10 This results from the fact that any single energy loss measurement on a thin gaseous sample has large Landau fluctuations, and at the same time different particles do not yield very different energy losses, with the exception of the nonrelativistic region.…”
Section: Tiie De/dx Techniquementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The thickness of the material, or the pad length, plays a crucial role in the dE/dx resolution. An empirical model of the dE/dx resolution can be given by[45,48]…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%