“…This is the case of Gaunersdorfer and Waser [6] in a recent review describing the progress on the synthesis of δ-sultones, when instead of using "CSICr" they wrote: "…of enolate-type nucleophilic addition reactions to access differently ring-sized sultones have been reported in the past, either via cyclization/addition of sulfonate-based carbanions to an adjacent electrophilic position (e. g., an ester or an aldehyde)…". [6] However, Xu and colleagues (reference 12 in Waser's review) used and cited the CSICr without complexes and prejudices. [7] Other authors neglected also the new name reaction to figure it: "…Aldol-Type Condensations and Related Processes…On the other hand, the intramolecular condensations of alkanesulfonates, derived from cyanohydrins, in the presence of different bases lead directly to β-amino α,β-unsaturated γ-sultone…", [8] or were totally reluctant to use the CSICr name, [9] still preferring the aldol reaction name, even in transformations using simple, non-carbohydrate precursors [10] following years later the original and pioneering approach proposed by Marco-Contelles [1,11] to extend the scope of the original sugar-like CSICr discovered by Gómez de las Heras et al [4] Then, since the beginning it was clear for us that a full survey of the real progresses of CSICr would be a difficult task, almost impossible.…”