Proceedings of the 2005 Particle Accelerator Conference
DOI: 10.1109/pac.2005.1591780
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Progress of 2-Cell Cavity Fabrication for Cornell ERL Injector

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

1
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The project is currently in the phase of prototyping its injector, which consists of a DC photo-emission gun, a normal conducting copper buncher cavity, and a booster cryomodule hosting five 2-cell superconducting RF (SRF) cavities [1] [2].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The project is currently in the phase of prototyping its injector, which consists of a DC photo-emission gun, a normal conducting copper buncher cavity, and a booster cryomodule hosting five 2-cell superconducting RF (SRF) cavities [1] [2].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The effective accelerating gradient was improved by a factor of 1.2, for a phase advance equal to 105°f or TW, because of the increased transit time factor in the cavity. In order to understand the maximum gain in accelerating gradient, the optimized traveling wave structure was compared with the SW re-entrant structure with 70 mm aperture, where the previous record values of gradient 54 MV m −1 have been achieved [7,14]. A higher accelerating gradient (59 MV m −1 ) was obtained in the Re-entrant structure with 60 mm aperture, but it was not taken as a reference because it does not allow us to build a nine-cell structure according to field flatness degradation issues.…”
Section: Regular Cell Parameter Optimizationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, large grain and monocrystal materials are currently being considered [5]; and (3) improvement of the structure shape in order to reduce the surface magnetic field for a given accelerating gradient. There are two ways to decrease the magnetic field: (1) develop a homogeneous magnetic field distribution over the cavity surface (low-loss structure [6] and Re-entrant structure [7]) and (2) improvement of the beam interaction with the structure, increasing the transit time factor (Re-entrant structure [7]).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Two main alternative cavity designs have been focused on: a re-entrant design which is being undertaken at Cornell University and a design at KEK based on a low-loss cavity shape known as the "Ichiro" cavity [7]. In both designs, increasing the accelerating gradient leads to a concurrent increase in the maximum magnetic field on the walls of the cavity and this results in a quenching of the superconducting state of the Nb [8]. Re-shaping the cells of the cavities allows the ratio of the peak magnetic field to the accelerating gradient to be reduced compared to that of the baseline TESLA shape.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%