2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.injury.2019.08.038
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Progress of instability in fragility fractures of the pelvis: An observational study

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

4
63
0
15

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 72 publications
(83 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
4
63
0
15
Order By: Relevance
“…Therefore, the usage of both classifications in our study are consistent. We found more complications and a longer stay in hospital in AO C patients compared to AO B. Interestingly, FFP II fractures showed a risk for complications comparable with AO B patients, whereas FFP III and IV revealed an increased risk for complications, even increased over AO C. Taking into account that there is a possibility of progression of fracture severity reported [ 42 , 43 ], further information seems to be mandatory which patients suffering FFP I or II fractures will heal conservatively, and which preferably should be offered early in the surgery to prevent progression. This is probably one of the most important questions in this field to be answered in the near future.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 73%
“…Therefore, the usage of both classifications in our study are consistent. We found more complications and a longer stay in hospital in AO C patients compared to AO B. Interestingly, FFP II fractures showed a risk for complications comparable with AO B patients, whereas FFP III and IV revealed an increased risk for complications, even increased over AO C. Taking into account that there is a possibility of progression of fracture severity reported [ 42 , 43 ], further information seems to be mandatory which patients suffering FFP I or II fractures will heal conservatively, and which preferably should be offered early in the surgery to prevent progression. This is probably one of the most important questions in this field to be answered in the near future.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 73%
“…It is likely that these fractures cause pain due to micro movements in the fracture zone, and therefore the patients try to reduce loading the fractured side. This goes along with the anatomical description of the FFP, where a higher FFP classification indicates a more unstable fracture type [24]. Referring to the fracture pattern and taking under consideration the degree of resulting instability, a conservative or operative treatment is generally recommended.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Rommens et al reported that fracture progression can occur in FFPs. They described a case of one patient who had an additional contralateral fracture after operative treatment of the fractured side 20 . Our technique involves the insertion of two screws into the ilium bilaterally and can be consider ILIS, which can prevent fracture progression in Type IIIA FFPs.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%