The NERC and CEH trademarks and logos ('the Trademarks') are registered trademarks of NERC in the UK and other countries, and may not be used without the prior written consent of the Trademark owner.
© 2017 Elsevier Ltd and British Mycological SocietyThis manuscript version is made available under the CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 license http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ This version available http://nora.nerc.ac.uk/516893/ NERC has developed NORA to enable users to access research outputs wholly or partially funded by NERC. Copyright and other rights for material on this site are retained by the rights owners. Users should read the terms and conditions of use of this material at http://nora.nerc.ac.uk/policies.html#access NOTICE: this is the author's version of a work that was accepted for publication in Fungal Ecology. Changes resulting from the publishing process, such as peer review, editing, corrections, structural formatting, and other quality control mechanisms may not be reflected in this document. Changes may have been made to this work since it was submitted for publication. A definitive version was subsequently published in Fungal Ecology (2017), 27 (A). 137-140. 10.1016/j.funeco.2017.03
Main textThe occurrence and abundance of fungal fruit bodies are variable under natural conditions. Where surveys have been conducted in the same area over multiple years, many species are not observed in all years (Sato et al., 2012) and there is often large variation in the number of fruit bodies produced when fruiting does occur (Straatsma et al., 2001; Pilz et al., 2006). It is important to understand the drivers of fruit body production because the presence or absence of fruit bodies is the primary measure used to determine the conservation status of fungi. Stipitate hydnoid fungi are ectomycorrhizal fungi which are considered to be rare in the United Kingdom based on infrequent observation of fruit bodies and evidence of declining occurrence across Europe (Newton et al., 2002). It has been noted that these fungi produce fruit bodies sporadically, with sometimes several years between fruit body records (van der Linde et al., 2012).Using molecular identification techniques it has been shown that stipitate hydnoid fungi can be present and active belowground and not fruit for several years (van der Linde et al., 2009Linde et al., , 2012 Gordon & Van Norman, 2014). This suggests that, for stipitate hydnoids, the sporadic fruiting patterns may be explained by variation in fruit body production between years, rather than rapid turnover of populations.One potential driver of interannual variation in fruit body production is weather. Both the timing and production of fruit bodies have been linked to yearly variation in temperature and rainfall (Krebs et al., 2008; Boddy et al., 2014). There is evidence from previous studies that lagged weather influences on fungal fruiting can be important, for example temperature in previous months or years (Krebs et al., 2008; Ágreda et al., 2016). To narrow down the large ...