2019
DOI: 10.1007/s10661-019-7210-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Progressing urban climate research using a high-density monitoring network system

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
23
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
0
23
0
Order By: Relevance
“…More recent studies have collected data to complement existing monitoring efforts (i.e., or have been operating as a sub network within a larger national network). These were in many cases associated with human health (Rogulski, 2018) or climate impacts (Shusterman et al, 2018;Šećerov et al, 2019) or had direct economic implications, for example through flooding (Horita et al, 2015) or fishing livelihoods (Wada et al, 2007). It should be noted that very few studies embraced the principles of open science and open data more generally (however see Rettig et al, 2014;Jones et al, 2015).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…More recent studies have collected data to complement existing monitoring efforts (i.e., or have been operating as a sub network within a larger national network). These were in many cases associated with human health (Rogulski, 2018) or climate impacts (Shusterman et al, 2018;Šećerov et al, 2019) or had direct economic implications, for example through flooding (Horita et al, 2015) or fishing livelihoods (Wada et al, 2007). It should be noted that very few studies embraced the principles of open science and open data more generally (however see Rettig et al, 2014;Jones et al, 2015).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In collaboration with related government institutions, private companies, local government, and residents, TOMACS aims to develop a predicting and monitoring early warning system of extreme phenomena, and to implement social experiments on extremeweather-resilient cities. In addition, a number of major field campaigns in different cities around the world have been conducted (1) in USA, for example URBAN 2000 (Allwine et al 2002); Joint Urban 2003 (Allwine et al 2004); Pentagon Shield (Warner et al 2007); Madison Square Garden (Hanna et al 2003); (2) in Europe, for example ESCOMPTE (Mestayer et al 2005); CAPITOUL (Masson et al 2008); BUBBLE (Rotach et al 2005); DAPPLE (Arnold et al 2004), MOCCA (Caluwaerts et al 2020), and for examples in the city of Szeged (Skarbit et al 2017) and Novi Sad (Secerov et al 2015;Šećerov et al 2019). Finally, there is still a need to harmonize collection practice, instrumentation, station location, and quality controls across cities to facilitate collaborative research (Muller et al 2015).…”
Section: Observations In Citiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The Berlin city (Germany) monitoring network of the Freie University, Institute for Meteorology (FUMINET) is measuring meteorological data every five minutes for microclimate and human thermal comfort investigations. Novi Sad (Serbia) has also implemented an automatic microclimatic urban monitoring network [35,36], comprising 25 urban stations and two stations located in non-urbanized environments, collecting air temperature and humidity data every 10 minute. In its turn, the climate of Szeged (Hungary) is monitored by 23 weather stations placed in urban conditions [37] and available at http://en.urban-path.hu/monitoring-system.…”
Section: In Situ Meteorological Datamentioning
confidence: 99%