2021
DOI: 10.1002/cam4.4347
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Progression‐free survival assessed per immune‐related or conventional response criteria, which is the better surrogate endpoint for overall survival in trials of immune‐checkpoint inhibitors in lung cancer: A systematic review and meta‐analysis

Abstract: This is an open access article under the terms of the Creat ive Commo ns Attri bution License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 70 publications
(153 reference statements)
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Multiple causes, such as tissue inflammation triggered by tumour growth or invasion, cancer itself, and the release of inflammatory mediators induced by leukocytes, contribute to systemic inflammation in cancer patients ( 23 ). Inflammatory marker readings have predictive relevance for cancer patients ( 24 , 25 ) because systemic inflammatory responses are responsible for cancer growth, invasion, metastasis, and resistance to chemotherapy. Specifically, for patients treated with immune checkpoint inhibitors, neutrophil-produced cytokines and chemokines can promote angiogenesis and extracellular matrix remodelling ( 26 ), creating a favourable microenvironment for cancer growth and impacting the efficacy of immune checkpoint inhibitors ( 27 ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Multiple causes, such as tissue inflammation triggered by tumour growth or invasion, cancer itself, and the release of inflammatory mediators induced by leukocytes, contribute to systemic inflammation in cancer patients ( 23 ). Inflammatory marker readings have predictive relevance for cancer patients ( 24 , 25 ) because systemic inflammatory responses are responsible for cancer growth, invasion, metastasis, and resistance to chemotherapy. Specifically, for patients treated with immune checkpoint inhibitors, neutrophil-produced cytokines and chemokines can promote angiogenesis and extracellular matrix remodelling ( 26 ), creating a favourable microenvironment for cancer growth and impacting the efficacy of immune checkpoint inhibitors ( 27 ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Systemic inflammation in cancer patients is caused by a variety of mechanisms ( 23 , 25 ), such as tissue inflammation induced by tumor growth or invasion, the cancer itself, and the production of inflammatory mediators induced by leukocytes. Systemic inflammatory responses are responsible for both cancer growth, invasion, metastasis, and resistance to chemotherapy, and have prognostic value for cancer patients ( 26 , 27 ). ICIs are now increasingly used in a variety of tumors, including hepatocellular liver cancer, and the use of ICIs can significantly improve the OS of patients with many advanced tumors.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Compared with OS, the follow-up duration of PFS is significantly shortened and has been used as a favorable surrogate endpoint for OS in different cancer therapies such as chemotherapy, radiotherapy, targeted therapy, etc. However, in the field of immunotherapy, whether PFS performs better than traditional response evaluation criteria such as OS in evaluating efficacy or clinical benefits has not been verified in clinical trial settings ( Zhu et al, 2021 ). Besides, several studies have demonstrated that advanced esophageal cancer patients with biomarker differences including no 11q13 chromosomal amplification, high tumor mutation burden (TMB), and microsatellite instability-high (MSI-H) tended to have greater OS rather than PFS benefit from PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors ( Mocellin et al, 2001 ; Greally and Ku, 2018 ; Lu et al, 2021 ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%