2010
DOI: 10.1016/j.jacc.2009.12.010
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Progression of Paroxysmal to Persistent Atrial Fibrillation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
14
0
2

Year Published

2011
2011
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
0
14
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…A score of 2-4 points was considered to indicate moderate risk, and a HATCH score of five or more points was considered to indicate high risk for the development of persistent AF [6]. The HATCH score was also investigated in other studies for progression of paroxysmal to persistent AF and was found to be useful in the study carried out by Jahangir and Murarka [20] and modestly useful in studies performed by Potpara et al [21] and Barret et al [22]. The HATCH score was also evaluated for predicting the recurrence of AF after catheter ablation in studies carried out by Tang et al [23], in which the score proved not to be useful.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A score of 2-4 points was considered to indicate moderate risk, and a HATCH score of five or more points was considered to indicate high risk for the development of persistent AF [6]. The HATCH score was also investigated in other studies for progression of paroxysmal to persistent AF and was found to be useful in the study carried out by Jahangir and Murarka [20] and modestly useful in studies performed by Potpara et al [21] and Barret et al [22]. The HATCH score was also evaluated for predicting the recurrence of AF after catheter ablation in studies carried out by Tang et al [23], in which the score proved not to be useful.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…7 Due to the impact of PoAF on intensive care and hospital stays, 7 health care costs, and patient morbidity and mortality, 4,1013 it is critical that we improve our ability to identify patients at high risk for developing PoAF for improved selection of prophylactic interventions, closer monitoring for postoperative complications, and establishing the risk of long-term AF. 1,7,31,32,34 Although several circulatory biomarkers have been proposed to stratify patients with a history of AF or at risk of AF and its complications, the existing data are conflicting (Table 1). Markers of active collagen synthesis (elevated PICP and PIIINP), ECM remodeling (elevated MMP-9), myocardial stretch (BNP, NTpro-BNP), inflammation ( RANKL, IL-6) and profibrotic mediators (TGF-β1) appear to be promising in identifying those at risk for the development of PoAF (Table 2).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A heterogeneous condition with variable etiology, natural history and prognosis [19,33], AF progresses with time in most patients, where infrequent self-terminating episodes that respond to rhythm controlling medication become more frequently sustained, with symptoms refractory to treatment, ultimately progressing to the permanent form [34-36]. In our study, patients with frequent PLMS were more likely to progress to require additional antiarrhythmic therapy for symptomatic recurrences or to permanent AF than those with infrequent PLMS.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%