2017
DOI: 10.4250/jcu.2017.25.3.98
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Progression of Right Ventricular Systolic Dysfunction Detected by Myocardial Deformation Imaging in Asymptomatic Preterm Children

Abstract: BackgroundTo detect progression of right ventricular (RV) systolic dysfunction (RVSD) in asymptomatic preterm children from infancy to 24-month corrected age, using velocity vector imaging (VVI).MethodsRetrospective study comparing sequential RV longitudinal peak systolic strain (LPSS) from 24 children born at < 33 weeks of gestational age and 10 term infants recruited as controls, obtained at a mean of 4-month (first exam) and 24-month corrected age (second exam).ResultsIn 7/24 (29.2%) of preterm children, RV… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
6
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

1
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
1
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The exact mechanism that explains why preterm infants have subclinical right ventricle dysfunction and alterations in right ventricle morphology that persists to 1 year of age is not yet known. We propose two theories that may explain this observation: 1) changes in postnatal loading conditions[26], and 2) loss of the third trimester myocardial structural programming[7]. The exposure of an immature preterm right ventricle to a sustained increase in hemodynamic load of postnatal circulation (increased right ventricle afterload), at a time in the development when the right ventricle primarily supports a low- resistance circulation, may induce myoarchitectural adaptation that can lead to changes in geometry, structure, and function, “a process known as ventricular remodeling”[27].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The exact mechanism that explains why preterm infants have subclinical right ventricle dysfunction and alterations in right ventricle morphology that persists to 1 year of age is not yet known. We propose two theories that may explain this observation: 1) changes in postnatal loading conditions[26], and 2) loss of the third trimester myocardial structural programming[7]. The exposure of an immature preterm right ventricle to a sustained increase in hemodynamic load of postnatal circulation (increased right ventricle afterload), at a time in the development when the right ventricle primarily supports a low- resistance circulation, may induce myoarchitectural adaptation that can lead to changes in geometry, structure, and function, “a process known as ventricular remodeling”[27].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Peak longitudinal right atrial strain (PLRAS) and RV longitudinal peak systolic strain was obtained by using vector velocity imaging as previously described. 18) 19) Briefly, in the apical 4-chamber view, the endocardial borders of the RA and RV were manually traced and subsequently tracked using the velocity vector imaging software. PLRAS values of the lateral free wall, interatrial septum, and the roof of the RA were measured at end-systole and averaged.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We have previously reported the intraobserver and interobserver variability of peak RV longitudinal strain in preterm infants to be 20% and 21%, respectively. 19) The mean percentage error 20) was calculated to obtain the intraobserver and interobserver variabilities of PLRAS, as described previously. 19) One investigator repeated deformation analysis of PLRAS 4 weeks apart on 30 infants to evaluate intraobserver variability.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Several studies have investigated cardiac function in the preterm population in the first months [17][18][19][20], at one year [21,22], at two years [23], and at school age [20,[24][25][26]. However, there is limited literature available that compares echocardiographic assessments between preschool-aged children with a history of prematurity and those born at full term.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%