2018 IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition 2018
DOI: 10.1109/cvpr.2018.00081
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Progressive Attention Guided Recurrent Network for Salient Object Detection

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
383
1
4

Year Published

2018
2018
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 596 publications
(388 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
0
383
1
4
Order By: Relevance
“…The higher that S-measure and E-measure are, the better results are the methods. For comparison with other salient region detection methods, we performed a horizontal evaluation with 12 classic or stateof-the-art methods, including GC [65], GMR [58], DRFI [66], FT [59], BMS [37], MDF [10], MTDNN [39], DCL [28], MSRNet [18], DSS [67], PAGR [68] and [69]. Among these methods, the first five are implemented based on traditional machine learning, while the rest of approaches operate using deep learning models.…”
Section: B Results and Comparisonsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The higher that S-measure and E-measure are, the better results are the methods. For comparison with other salient region detection methods, we performed a horizontal evaluation with 12 classic or stateof-the-art methods, including GC [65], GMR [58], DRFI [66], FT [59], BMS [37], MDF [10], MTDNN [39], DCL [28], MSRNet [18], DSS [67], PAGR [68] and [69]. Among these methods, the first five are implemented based on traditional machine learning, while the rest of approaches operate using deep learning models.…”
Section: B Results and Comparisonsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We compare our method with 16 previous state-of-the-art methods, namely MDF [28], RFCN [18], UCF [20], Amulet [13], NLDF [12], DSS [31], BMPM [21], PAGR [50], PiCANet [51], SRM [16], DGRL [32], MLMS [52], AFNet [53], CapSal [54], BASNet [15], and CPD [55]. For a fair comparison, we use the saliency maps provided by the authors.…”
Section: Comparison With the State-of-the-artmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The unit of the total number of parameters (denoted as #Par) is million. Note that the authors of [50] did not release the code, and they just provided the saliency maps, and thus reporting the total number of parameters is not possible for this method. (RRM).…”
Section: Ablation Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We compare the proposed saliency detection method against previous 18 state-of-the-art methods, namely, MDF [13], RFCN [31], DHS [32], UCF [46], Amulet [34], NLDF [47], DSS [48], RAS [49], BMPM [33], PAGR [50], PiCANet [51], SRM [18], DGRL [17], MLMS [52], AFNet [53], CapSal [54], BASNet [55], and CPD [16]. We perform comparisons on five challenging datasets.…”
Section: Comparison With the State-of-the-artmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The unit of the total number of parameters (denoted as #Par) is million. Note that the authors of[50] did not release the code, and they just provided the saliency maps, and thus reporting the total number of parameters is not possible for this method.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%