2010
DOI: 10.1016/j.compstruct.2009.05.011
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Progressive damage analysis of composite bolted joints with liquid shim layers using constant and continuous degradation models

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
61
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 117 publications
(64 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
1
61
0
Order By: Relevance
“…7 shows the load displacement curves for different friction coefficients. It is well know that an increment in friction coefficient between plates increases the joint strength [28]. The numerical FE model can reproduce this effect observed in experimental tests re ported in literature.…”
Section: Effect Of Friction Coefficientsupporting
confidence: 60%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…7 shows the load displacement curves for different friction coefficients. It is well know that an increment in friction coefficient between plates increases the joint strength [28]. The numerical FE model can reproduce this effect observed in experimental tests re ported in literature.…”
Section: Effect Of Friction Coefficientsupporting
confidence: 60%
“…A parametric study was carried out to verify the capability of the FE model to reproduce the influence of friction coefficient and tightening torque observed in experimental results [28,15]. Fig.…”
Section: Effect Of Friction Coefficientmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Experimental approaches have been widely used for such studies [1][2][3][4][5][6][7][8][9], while numerical simulations of increasing sophistication are enhancing our understanding of the often complex mechanical response. Recently, three-dimensional (3D) finite element (FE) models have been used to capture the non-uniform, through-thickness stress distributions [10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17], and models to predict the onset and growth of material damage have been incorporated [18][19][20][21][22][23][24][25][26]. The majority of these analyses used implicit FE solvers, which generally have difficulties in converging all the way to the ultimate failure point of CBJs [27], mainly due to the complexity of contact definition between bolts and a damaging laminate.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They range from 2D models with rigid pins representing the bolt [78,105,106], to 3D solid models with or without damage development in the composite [47,52,72,76,80,103,[107][108][109][110][111] and they include parameters such as bolt pretension, bolt clearance, the effect of countersunk/protruding bolt heads, different failure initiation and damage progression models, by-pass loading, implicit/explicit solution methods etc. This work includes solid models of countersunk single-lap joints, cf.…”
Section: Modelling Of Quasi-static Failurementioning
confidence: 99%