2022 IEEE 16th International Conference on Advanced Trends in Radioelectronics, Telecommunications and Computer Engineering (TC 2022
DOI: 10.1109/tcset55632.2022.9766871
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Progressive DCT-based coder and its comparison to atomic function based image lossy compression

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…One important task is to choose encoder parameters such that compression is performed near the optimal operating point (OOP) [20,[23][24][25][26], which ensures that the decoded image is as close as possible to the original image based on the chosen criterion. The existence of the optimal operating point (OOP) has been demonstrated for various types of noise [20], compression methods based on discrete cosine transform (DCT) [27,28], and wavelets [22]. Different criteria such as mean-square error (MSE) and peak signal-to-noise ratio (PSNR) [21,24], as well as metrics that consider visual quality such as PSNR-HVS-M and MSSIM [29], can be used to determine the OOP.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One important task is to choose encoder parameters such that compression is performed near the optimal operating point (OOP) [20,[23][24][25][26], which ensures that the decoded image is as close as possible to the original image based on the chosen criterion. The existence of the optimal operating point (OOP) has been demonstrated for various types of noise [20], compression methods based on discrete cosine transform (DCT) [27,28], and wavelets [22]. Different criteria such as mean-square error (MSE) and peak signal-to-noise ratio (PSNR) [21,24], as well as metrics that consider visual quality such as PSNR-HVS-M and MSSIM [29], can be used to determine the OOP.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Generally, ( ) was introduced in [23]. In [24], it has been shown in terms of image compression efficiency that DAT is as useful as DCT, which is classic data processing tool [25]. An important advantage of DAT compared to DCT is computational complexity.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%