2001
DOI: 10.1016/s0377-2217(00)00116-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Progressive hedging as a meta-heuristic applied to stochastic lot-sizing

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
32
0

Year Published

2005
2005
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
4
4

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 60 publications
(32 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
0
32
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The samples, in which the maximum distances are increased to 600 of their minimum levels, (350 ), lead to less expected total cost in all cases and less opened facilities in some cases. For instance, in low impact events (0.05) six facilities (4,6,7,8,9, and 10) are opened when maximum distance is restricted to 350 . However, the number of opened facilities is reduced to five (3,6,7,9, and 10) when maximum distance is increased to 400 .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The samples, in which the maximum distances are increased to 600 of their minimum levels, (350 ), lead to less expected total cost in all cases and less opened facilities in some cases. For instance, in low impact events (0.05) six facilities (4,6,7,8,9, and 10) are opened when maximum distance is restricted to 350 . However, the number of opened facilities is reduced to five (3,6,7,9, and 10) when maximum distance is increased to 400 .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The proposed mathematical formulation is a two-stage stochastic mixed integer programming (SMIP) model, which is addressed as NP hard problems [6]. In many situations, parameters of the optimization problems cannot be known with certainty [5,7,8,9,10], in such cases stochastic programming (SP) methodologies are one of the strategies to apply. In two-stage stochastic programming, first-stage decisions are made in the existence of uncertainty for future scenarios.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One example is progressive hedging, also known as scenario aggregation; see, e.g., (Birge, 1997;Kall and Wallace, 1994) for a tutorial treatment and (Haugen et al, 2001) for an application to lot-sizing with setup costs. Another manufacturing application of scenario aggregation is proposed in (Jönsson et al, 1993).…”
Section: Split Variable Model Formulationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Due to the model uncertainty, approximation methods are applied to reformulate the lot-sizing models for performing deterministic mixed integer programming (MIP) in the literature. Haugen et al [9] generated subproblems for each scenario solved heuristically to capture the nature of demand uncertainty and specify a reasonable number of representative scenarios. Brandimarte [10] modeled the demand uncertainty through generating scenario trees.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%