2019
DOI: 10.1080/00128775.2019.1671201
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Progressive Tax Reforms in Flat Tax Countries

Abstract: The adoption of flat tax systems in Central and Eastern European countries have often been supported by arguments of simplicity, higher compliance and lower distortionary effects. However, since income inequality is high in these countries, the question of introducing some progressivity has come to the fore in both policy and academic circles. In this paper, we combine microsimulation and macro models to analyze the effects of moving from a flat to a progressive tax system and we find that a reduction in incom… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
14
0
4

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 30 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
1
14
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…Although the impact is modest, our findings highlight the beneficial impact of a progressive taxation on income inequalities in comparison to the current 10% flat-rate tax system applied in Romania. Our results are consistent with the international literature review [27,28], indicating that a change in the personal income tax policy regime is generally expected to be modest but positive, as the progressive tax-benefit system assures a better consideration for the needs of poorer households as compared to the rest of the household income distribution.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 90%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Although the impact is modest, our findings highlight the beneficial impact of a progressive taxation on income inequalities in comparison to the current 10% flat-rate tax system applied in Romania. Our results are consistent with the international literature review [27,28], indicating that a change in the personal income tax policy regime is generally expected to be modest but positive, as the progressive tax-benefit system assures a better consideration for the needs of poorer households as compared to the rest of the household income distribution.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 90%
“…However, there are numerous studies that argue that these effects are not very intense (see for instance [27,28], among others). With regard to the household sector, the most important adverse effects of progressive taxation are related to labor supply, saving behavior and the avoidance of paying taxes.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Finally, most recent literature motivated by the rising inequality of some of the Central and Eastern European countries have started analysing effects of introducing progressive tax schedules in these economies. Using EUROMOD microsimulation framework and macro model paper by Salvador Barrios et al (2020) analyze fiscal, redistributive and macroeconomic impact of several progressive tax scenarios in Bulgaria, Estonia, Latvia, Lithuania, Hungary and Romania. They find positive effects on redistribution and inequaity in all countries.…”
Section: Using Microsimulation Models In Tax Policy Analysis: a Survey Of The Existing Literaturementioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, there is each spouse as a separate taxpayer and social insurance contributions are 18.5% of income for employees (National Tax and Customs Administration of Hungary, 2018). It should be noted that Romania and Bulgaria have a flat personal income tax (PIT) rate like Hungary (Barrios, et al 2018). According to the current tax rules of the Republic of Belarus (Tax code of the Republic of Belarus, 2017), they have personal income tax at a fixed rate: Income from employment -9%; individual entrepreneurs applying the General tax regime -16%; revenue from prizes received from gambling organizers is -4%.…”
Section: Proportionate Income Taxationmentioning
confidence: 99%