2021
DOI: 10.48550/arxiv.2103.13875
|View full text |Cite
Preprint
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Progressive-X+: Clustering in the Consensus Space

Abstract: We propose Progressive-X + , a new algorithm for finding an unknown number of geometric models, e.g., homographies. The problem is formalized as finding dominant model instances progressively without forming crisp pointto-model assignments. Dominant instances are found via RANSAC-like sampling and a consolidation process driven by a model quality function considering previously proposed instances. New ones are found by clustering in the consensus space. This new formulation leads to a simple iterative algorith… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 53 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…RANSACbased methods(e.g. [28] [9] [10] [35] [29] [11]) run revised RANSAC sequentially to obtain multiple model parameters. They change the sampling weight of each point in each iteration to get different model parameters.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…RANSACbased methods(e.g. [28] [9] [10] [35] [29] [11]) run revised RANSAC sequentially to obtain multiple model parameters. They change the sampling weight of each point in each iteration to get different model parameters.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, this approach needs to train a detector or a segementation network [39] [25] for specific objects or classes, which does not apply to unknown objects or ar-bitrary 3D scans. Another solution is via multi-model fitting [32] [33] [34] or [35] [29] [11]. Existing multi-model fitting methods rely on sampling valid hypotheses, which involves a large number of sampling steps when the number of models or the outlier ratio becomes high, making the efficiency and robustness of those algorithms drop drastically.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…CBS [111], DGSAC [1], P-x [112], P-xp [113] and MLink [114]. In all cases we ran the methods in the same platform (PC with 2.7GHz Intel core i7 processor) using code publicly available or provided by the authors (except for DGSAC for which we report values from [1].…”
Section: Experimental Evaluationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Conversely, T-Linkage, RCM, DGSAC, Prog-x, Prog-xp, and MLink estimate this number but require an inlier threshold, which may depend on the dataset. Prog-x [112] is implemented in Python, Prog-xp [113] in C++, and the rest in Matlab.…”
Section: Experimental Evaluationmentioning
confidence: 99%