1998
DOI: 10.1007/978-94-011-3969-4_5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Progressives, States and Backgrounding

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0
2

Year Published

2003
2003
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
0
4
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…[6] Lack of space precludes a discussion of the fo reground/background distinction in connection with the imparfait (see Anscombre 1992, Glasbey 1998, Irandoust 1998 fo r some approaches pertaining to this question).…”
Section: Endnotesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[6] Lack of space precludes a discussion of the fo reground/background distinction in connection with the imparfait (see Anscombre 1992, Glasbey 1998, Irandoust 1998 fo r some approaches pertaining to this question).…”
Section: Endnotesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Another way of thinking of this is that both statives and perfects provide background information (Glasbey 1998), while event sentences are foregrounded. A related issue concerns the "out of the blue" interpretation.…”
Section: Temporal Interpretation Of Discoursementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Fortunately, not every linguist agrees that progressive sentences are stative sentences. Counterarguments have been produced by Smith (1991), Bertinetto (1994), and Glasbey (1998). In particular, Bertinetto (1994) has a very detailed review of the pros and cons and rejects treating progressive sentences as statives.…”
Section: (10) Ta Mei Zaimentioning
confidence: 99%