Prohibited commoning

Abstract

Oddly, criminal prohibition can lead to “commoning,” when individuals, left unprotected by state and formal property rights, innovate collective systems to access, use, and benefit from illegalized resources. “Legalization” entails the conversion of these prohibited commons to legal property systems, bringing new freedoms and liberties as well as the dispossession of collectively generated assets (material, relational, and otherwise). This paradox of legalization is currently playing out among U.S. states moving to legalize cannabis. Motivated by the failures of cannabis prohibition and its grievous harms, the question looms: How will states and markets grapple with the collectively generated assets and relational systems generated under prohibition? Building from ethnographic research and survey data, this article argues for recognition of the commoning practices that produced the resources upon which the legal market is based. These practices illuminate ways that legalization may deliver not only markets and regulation but also emancipatory justice in the wake of the War on Drugs. First, we document the commoning practices of cannabis cultivators, the collective benefits they generated under prohibition, and how legalization is affecting these practices and dynamics. Second, we explore strategies, like allotment and pricing systems, that build from prohibited commoning practices to achieve greater collective benefits and the emancipatory potential of legalization.

Economic Governance of Cannabis: The Implications of Polycentric Governance in Mendocino County

“…However, existing analysis of emerging U.S. cannabis markets suggests that many legacy farmers continue producing illegally rather than engaging in the legalized governance system (Chicago Lewis 2019; Nosowitz 2021). In parallel, recent research highlights how cannabis policy design and implementation appear to have bypassed pre-existing institutional arrangements created by prohibition-era legacy farmers (Polson and Bodwitch, 2021). We thus expect that a coproduction deficit may appear in Mendocino County.…”