SUMMARYHeretofore, the principal focus of the Deep Burn Project was to plan, carry out, and evaluate the process of once-through burning of plutonium (Pu) and minor actinides (MA), i.e., residual transuranics (TRU) from used fuel in a reactor. First, transmutation or fissioning, collectively termed burning, in a high temperature reactor (HTR) was considered. This included evaluating both the pebble bed and the prismatic block HTR as a platform for deep burning of the plutonium and minor actinides. In the second half of FY-2011, the Idaho National Laboratory, along with the other project participants, started evaluating the possible use of existing, current generation, light water reactors (LWRs) as the platform for deployment of the Deep Burn concept. Therefore, starting in March 2011, the INL has been evaluating the neutronic design and feasibility of the Deep Burn concept in a LWR. This application would use a new type of fuel. The new fuel form, termed "Fully-Ceramic Micro-encapsulated" (FCM) fuel, is a concept that borrows the tri-isotropic (TRISO) fuel particle design from high-temperature reactor technology. In the Deep Burn LWR (DB-LWR) concept, these fuel particles are pressed into compacts using silicon carbide (SiC) for matrix material and are loaded into fuel pins for use in conventional LWRs. The TRU loading comes from the spent fuel of a conventional LWR after 5 years of cooling.In conjunction with designing the fuel and evaluating its neutronic performance, the INL has also been evaluating the material performance of the fuel using modeling as the means of such an evaluation. These two activities are reported upon in two companion reports [B. Boer, et. al., FCR&D-2011-000338 or INL/EXT-11-23313, and R. S. Sen et al., FCR&D-2011-00037 or INL/EXT-11-23269]. Although the fuel modeling uses a state-of-the-art code for evaluating the failure frequency of the fuel, it is still necessary for the fuel to be tested experimentally. The main reason for this is that the fuel type under consideration is new and has not been previously tested. Furthermore, the code, though verified, was never validated for this new type of fuel as the relevant experimental data were never previously generated. It is important to note, however, that although a formal validation was not carried out, the code predictions matched systematically the available experimental results for UO 2 -based TRISO fuel from the Next Generation Nuclear Plant (NGNP) project. This should provide confidence that the code predictions are likely to be correct for DB fuel, provided the modifications incorporated into the code capture all the differences in artifacts between the two types of fuel. However, the only sure way to verify that this is indeed a fact is to carry out (at least some) experimental tests on the DB fuel. The modifications to the fuel modeling code are discussed in the companion report [B. Boer, et. al., FCR&D-2011-000338 or INL/EXT-11-23313].Recently, the INL Deep Burn team and its partners outside the INL have been considering the...