2018
DOI: 10.1186/s40814-018-0251-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Project HELP: a study protocol to pilot test a shared decision-making tool about treatment options for patients with hepatitis C and chronic kidney disease

Abstract: BackgroundRecent advances in treatment have given patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD) access to safer and more effective medications to treat comorbid hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection. Given the variety and complexity of treatment options that depend on patients’ clinical characteristics and personal preferences, education and decision support are needed to prepare patients better to discuss treatment options with their clinicians.MethodsDrawing on International Patient Decision Aids Standards guidelin… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It is important for providers to recognize this population of patients with co‐morbid chronic HCV and CKD as a “special patient population” and to take care to consider from all angles‐ most appropriate regimen selection, timing of therapy, and drug–drug interactions. The HCV DAA revolution has allowed for a new clinical paradigm in guiding care of patients with co‐morbid HCV and ESRD seeking kidney transplantation including consideration of a delay in therapy and acceptance of HCV viremic organs for both viremic and non‐viremic recipients . This is addressed elsewhere in detail within this special Seminars in Dialysis issue.…”
Section: Phase 2/3 Data For Daa Regimens With Esrd Labelingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is important for providers to recognize this population of patients with co‐morbid chronic HCV and CKD as a “special patient population” and to take care to consider from all angles‐ most appropriate regimen selection, timing of therapy, and drug–drug interactions. The HCV DAA revolution has allowed for a new clinical paradigm in guiding care of patients with co‐morbid HCV and ESRD seeking kidney transplantation including consideration of a delay in therapy and acceptance of HCV viremic organs for both viremic and non‐viremic recipients . This is addressed elsewhere in detail within this special Seminars in Dialysis issue.…”
Section: Phase 2/3 Data For Daa Regimens With Esrd Labelingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Similar success with user-centered design has been demonstrated in the development of paper and electronic tools for both patients and clinicians. [23][24][25][26][27][28][34][35][36][37][38][39] Methodologies for tool development include semi-structured patient and caregiver interviews, interviews with clinicians / health care providers, focus groups led by trained facilitators, panel discussions with expert clinicians and/or stakeholders, and direct observation of patient and clinician interaction with the tool. However, the research surrounding field testing methodology in healthcare is heterogeneous.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the research surrounding field testing methodology in healthcare is heterogeneous. [34][35][36][37][38][39] Multiple types of tools (education, decision making, other) in multiple formats (print, audio-visual, electronic, web-based) have been field or pilot tested for usability using various methods (including questionnaires, interviews, and direct observation) with patients and health care providers. [34][35][36][37][38][39] These processes resulted in tool revision, improved patient acceptability, and supported feasibility.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We developed a patient education and decision support tool with an advisory board, which consists of patients, nephrologists, and hepatologists through the HELP (Helping Empower Liver and Kidney Patients) study. 26 This tool provides: (1) plain language information about treatment options for HCV infection and CKD; (2) education that is tailored to a user’s self-reported prior treatments, current stages of CKD and liver fibrosis, and additional medical conditions; (3) an assessment to elicit users’ values that may influence their choice of treatment; and (4) a printable summary page that can facilitate patient-clinician discussions about treatment needs, values, and questions.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%