2010
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijpe.2009.11.025
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Project performance development framework: An approach for developing performance criteria & measures for information systems (IS) projects

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
35
0
5

Year Published

2011
2011
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 80 publications
(40 citation statements)
references
References 53 publications
0
35
0
5
Order By: Relevance
“…Includes the most relevant processes that drive efficiency in the implementation phases, monitoring and control of the project, to establish congenital dependency on the strategy and business goals (Bouer & Carvalho, 2005;Barcaui et al, 2006;Barbosa et al, 2009;Dinsmore, 2010;Bakker et al, 2010;Barclay & Osei-Bryson, 2010;Kerzner, 2011;Noro, 2012;Silva & Feitosa, 2012). The construct Operations consists of the variables: Performance Metrics, Change Control, Attenuation/Leverage Risk and Level of Satisfaction.…”
Section: Operations -Control Of the Operations Environment In Projectsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Includes the most relevant processes that drive efficiency in the implementation phases, monitoring and control of the project, to establish congenital dependency on the strategy and business goals (Bouer & Carvalho, 2005;Barcaui et al, 2006;Barbosa et al, 2009;Dinsmore, 2010;Bakker et al, 2010;Barclay & Osei-Bryson, 2010;Kerzner, 2011;Noro, 2012;Silva & Feitosa, 2012). The construct Operations consists of the variables: Performance Metrics, Change Control, Attenuation/Leverage Risk and Level of Satisfaction.…”
Section: Operations -Control Of the Operations Environment In Projectsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…But indicator systems is a topic not yet addressed in the project literature. However, there are the indicators that measure the quality of the process to achieve the final results, and these should be assessed by consistent criteria (Kerzner, 2006;Barclay & Osei-Bryson, 2010;Borges & Carvalho, 2011). So, being accurate in assessing the progress of activities is crucial as the project progresses, since the indicators are input to performance analysis and decision making in projects.…”
Section: Operations -Control Of the Operations Environment In Projectsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Del mismo modo, para el área de conocimiento de la dirección de proyectos la evaluación del rendimiento se basa en la medición y seguimiento de los criterios de ejecución de los proyectos (Barclay & Osei-Bryson, 2010), y tradicionalmente, también el rendimiento de los proyectos se ha visto como función que depende del tiempo, del coste y de la calidad (Pillai, Joshi, & Rao, 2002) (Wi & Jung, 2010). En tal sentido, este artículo se enfoca en los aspectos relacionados con la evaluación cuantitativa del desempeño de proyectos durante la fase de ejecución, para lo cual, por lo general se han utilizado medidas del progreso que permiten tomar acciones correctivas cuando es necesario (Kwak and Ibbs, 2002).…”
Section: Palavras-chaveunclassified
“…However, we accepted only four articles because we had difficulties to interpret any type of definition for success/failure from most of the articles published in that journal. Articles that include the customer's perspective only [13], [32], [34], [36], [43], [44], [45], [46], [47], [48], [49], [50], [51], [52], [53], [54], [55], [56], [57], [58], [59], [60], [61], [62], [63], [64], [65], [66], [67], [68], [69], [70], [71], [72], [73], [74], [75], [76], [77], [78], [79], [80], [81], [82], [83], [84], [85], [86], [87], …”
Section: Answers To Research Questionsmentioning
confidence: 99%