2018
DOI: 10.1007/s00500-018-3277-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Project portfolio selection based on synergy degree of composite system

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
14
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 34 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
0
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Policy synergy can be defined from three perspectives: objective, process, and state. The objective of policy synergy is to make interpolicy collaboration produce effects that are higher than the sum of each policy performance and reduce interdepartmental conflicts (Bai et al, 2018). From the perspective of process, Bai et al (2018) argued that policy synergy is the process by which two or more policies coordinate to achieve a common objective.…”
Section: Research On Policy Synergymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Policy synergy can be defined from three perspectives: objective, process, and state. The objective of policy synergy is to make interpolicy collaboration produce effects that are higher than the sum of each policy performance and reduce interdepartmental conflicts (Bai et al, 2018). From the perspective of process, Bai et al (2018) argued that policy synergy is the process by which two or more policies coordinate to achieve a common objective.…”
Section: Research On Policy Synergymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The business strategy becomes a reference for project portfolio management to be consistent with the goals of the company so that it can provide competitive advantage, reputation, and widen the business scope [15]. Organizational goals can be achieved if there is good collaboration between business strategy and projects using project portfolio management [5].…”
Section: Project Portfolio Managementmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Two types of models were proposed respectively by Dou et al [16] based on single and multi-objectives to select the optimal portfolio to maximize objective values. However, these approaches are not always suitable for two main reasons [40]: (i) evolutional and comprehensive strategy regulates the criteria to select project portfolios, but poorly selected criteria could hinder portfolio implementation to reach its strategy [25], (ii) There may exist complicated and dynamical synergies [44] among candidate projects, which can be easily omitted by mistake in PPS and this is quite common that will affect PPS decision making [4]. However, the best project when taking individually, may not necessarily form the best set of projects when taken as a group of projects in project portfolio.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, financial target is an important issue to maximize the benefits from the projects in the strategic criteria to select optimal project portfolio [6]. However, over-reliance on the financial selection criteria may conflict with organizational long-term development objectives [4]. Therefore, an organizational strategy not only includes the combination of financial and non-financial targets, but also must include long-and short-term plans, and the internal and external stakeholder management that all need to be considered in PPS process.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%