2001
DOI: 10.1016/s0024-6301(01)00097-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Project Success: A Multidimensional Strategic Concept

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

18
664
0
84

Year Published

2012
2012
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
5
1
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 871 publications
(766 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
18
664
0
84
Order By: Relevance
“…Each project or a set of closely related projects has its own contextual circumstances that have a significant impact upon the project's success. In addition, the literature contains many success criteria groups such as the project efficiency criteria group (Shenhar et al 2001). However, these groups of criteria do not impact equally on the overall project success and upon each other.…”
Section: The Four-level Project Success Frameworkmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Each project or a set of closely related projects has its own contextual circumstances that have a significant impact upon the project's success. In addition, the literature contains many success criteria groups such as the project efficiency criteria group (Shenhar et al 2001). However, these groups of criteria do not impact equally on the overall project success and upon each other.…”
Section: The Four-level Project Success Frameworkmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Even though they consider these as four distinct dimensions, direct success and preparing for the future are business dimensions with a timeframe difference; short term and long term, respectively. Later, these four dimensions (containing 13 measures) formed a project success multidimensional strategic framework (Shenhar et al 2001). Assessing the F-20 project according to this framework shows that the project failed at the business dimension when it could not attract sales.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Thus, defining and assessing project success is a strategic management imperative (Shenhar et al [14]). Cost, time, and quality are measures that have become inextricably linked over the last 50 years with project success.…”
Section: Theoretical Backgroundmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Project success and failure were first introduced by Rubin and Seeling [13], with Shenhar et al [14], Pinto and Mantel [11] reiterating that project success was contingent upon the specific project characteristics. Shultz, Slevin and Pinto [15] were among the first to classify the critical factors.…”
Section: Theoretical Backgroundmentioning
confidence: 99%