2018
DOI: 10.1177/0098628318816129
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Project Syllabus: An Exploratory Study of Learner-Centered Syllabi

Abstract: Recent research suggests that designing a syllabus using learner-centered principles may increase students’ perceptions of their instructor on the characteristics of rapport, caring, helpfulness, willingness to seek help from the instructor, and student motivation. Typically, a learner-centered syllabus is one that presents a positive tone at the point of a student’s first contact with a course and describes collaborative opportunities, repeated opportunities for formative assessment, and a sense of ownership … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
25
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2025
2025

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 34 publications
(26 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
1
25
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For example, earlier we noted that research on student learning aligns with I-O psychology research regarding training/learning objectives (Noe, 2017), stereotype threat (Dennehy et al, 2018), social loafing and team accountability (Dommeyer, 2012), and transformational leadership/teaching (Balwant, 2016). This aligns with the broader field of SoTL, which has many examples of the applying science to learning in psychology classrooms (e.g., Boser et al, 2017;Richmond et al, 2019); there is even a journal devoted solely to SoTL in psychology: Teaching of Psychology. That there is overlap is hardly surprising, given the similarities between training/ managing in the workplace and teaching in higher education, but it is good to see nonetheless.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 53%
“…For example, earlier we noted that research on student learning aligns with I-O psychology research regarding training/learning objectives (Noe, 2017), stereotype threat (Dennehy et al, 2018), social loafing and team accountability (Dommeyer, 2012), and transformational leadership/teaching (Balwant, 2016). This aligns with the broader field of SoTL, which has many examples of the applying science to learning in psychology classrooms (e.g., Boser et al, 2017;Richmond et al, 2019); there is even a journal devoted solely to SoTL in psychology: Teaching of Psychology. That there is overlap is hardly surprising, given the similarities between training/ managing in the workplace and teaching in higher education, but it is good to see nonetheless.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 53%
“…The Syllabus: Inequality Producer or Inclusive Pedagogical Tool? Richmond et al 2019). The syllabus is also there to convey critical information and act as a guide for the students as they progress through the course (Matejka and Kurke 1994;Raymark and Conner-Greene 2002).…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Broader educational research has focused on syllabi that enhance student engagement. These syllabi are known as "learner-centered" (Richmond et al, 2019;Weimer, 2002). Such syllabi are characterized by the following items (Wheeler et al, 2019):…”
Section: The Problemmentioning
confidence: 99%