2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.brainresbull.2021.01.012
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Projecting neurons in spinal dorsal horn send collateral projections to dorsal midline/intralaminar thalamic complex and parabrachial nucleus

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 73 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In the ROSA iDTR ;CX3CR1 CreER/+ mice with microglia ablation, HA and C48/80 induced c‐fos up‐regulation were significantly inhibited compared with the WT groups, respectively ( p < .0001 for both) (Figures 3b and 4b). However, CQ‐induced total c‐fos up‐regulation was not reduced by microglia ablation ( p = .073), but the c‐fos + cell distribution were changed that the c‐fos + cells clustered in the lateral spinal nucleus (LSN) were significantly reduced ( p < .0001), where most of the ascending projection neurons were located (Li et al, 2021; Figure 5b). For the Npr1+ neurons, the percentage of c‐fos + cells were increased from 8.60 ± 0.66% to 23.50 ± 2.05% ( p < .0001) in the HA‐treated WT mice (Figure 3c), to 19.85 ± 1.97% ( p < .0001) in the C48/80‐treated WT mice (Figure 4c), to 26.7 ± 4.09% ( p < .0001) in the CQ‐treated WT mice (Figure 5c).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In the ROSA iDTR ;CX3CR1 CreER/+ mice with microglia ablation, HA and C48/80 induced c‐fos up‐regulation were significantly inhibited compared with the WT groups, respectively ( p < .0001 for both) (Figures 3b and 4b). However, CQ‐induced total c‐fos up‐regulation was not reduced by microglia ablation ( p = .073), but the c‐fos + cell distribution were changed that the c‐fos + cells clustered in the lateral spinal nucleus (LSN) were significantly reduced ( p < .0001), where most of the ascending projection neurons were located (Li et al, 2021; Figure 5b). For the Npr1+ neurons, the percentage of c‐fos + cells were increased from 8.60 ± 0.66% to 23.50 ± 2.05% ( p < .0001) in the HA‐treated WT mice (Figure 3c), to 19.85 ± 1.97% ( p < .0001) in the C48/80‐treated WT mice (Figure 4c), to 26.7 ± 4.09% ( p < .0001) in the CQ‐treated WT mice (Figure 5c).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, CQ-induced total c-fos up-regulation was not reduced by microglia ablation ( p = .073), but the c-fos + cell distribution were changed that the c-fos + cells clustered in the lateral spinal nucleus (LSN) were significantly reduced ( p < .0001), where most of the ascending projection neurons were located (Li et al, 2021; Figure 5b).…”
Section: Depletion Of Central Microglia Inhibited Acute Itch Response...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The main sources of afferents to the rostral ILt arise from structures/regions of the brainstem and cortex. The following brainstem nuclei project to the rostral ILt: dorsal and median raphe nuclei (Vertes, 1991 ; Hermann et al, 1996 ; Morin and Meyer-Bernstein, 1999 ; Vertes et al, 1999 , 2010 ; Krout et al, 2002 ; Muzerelle et al, 2016 ; Urban et al, 2016 ), locus coeruleus (Jones and Yang, 1985 ; Krout et al, 2002 ), pedunculopontine (PPT) and laterodorsal tegmental (LDT) nuclei (Hallanger et al, 1987 ; Hallanger and Wainer, 1988 ; Bolton et al, 1993 ), the ventral tegmental area (Beckstead et al, 1979 ; Krout et al, 2002 ), parabrachial complex (Bester et al, 1999 ; Krout and Loewy, 2000a ; Bourgeais et al, 2001 ; Iwai et al, 2015 ; Deng et al, 2020 ), periaqueductal gray (Cameron et al, 1995 ; Krout and Loewy, 2000b ; Kincheski et al, 2012 ; Sun et al, 2020 ), superior colliculus (Yamasaki et al, 1986 ; Krout et al, 2001 ), nucleus incertus (Goto et al, 2001 ; Olucha-Bordonau et al, 2003 ), the dorsal horn of the spinal cord (Li et al, 2021a ) and dense projections from the mesencephalic, pontine, and medullary reticular formation (Glenn and Steriade, 1982 ; Vertes et al, 1986 ; Vertes and Martin, 1988 ; Villanueva et al, 1998 ; Krout et al, 2002 ). The rostral ILt nuclei also receive significant, but more limited, input from diencephalic structures including the reticular nucleus of thalamus (Velayos et al, 1989 ; Kolmac and Mitrofanis, 1997 ), the zona incerta (Power et al, 1999 ; Power and Mitrofanis, 2001 ), the substantia nigra pars reticulata (McElvain et al, 2021 ), and the lateral and supramammillary nuclei of the hypothalamus (Vertes, 1992 ; Peyron et al, 1998 ).…”
Section: Rostral Intralaminar Nuclei (Central Medial Paracentral Cent...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is thought that the spinoparabrachial tract and the PBN are involved in pain processing (Basbaum et al, 2009;Dunckley et al, 2005;Youssef et al, 2016). Several tracing and in vivo electrophysiological studies in rodents have shown that the PBN is also involved in itch processing (Akiyama et al, 2016;Jansen and Giesler, 2015;Li et al, 2021b). A study found that the PBN serves as a critical itch-processing nucleus .…”
Section: Mu and Y-g Sunmentioning
confidence: 99%