Ecmor Xvii 2020
DOI: 10.3997/2214-4609.202035245
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Projection-based Embedded Discrete Fracture Model (pEDFM) on Corner-point Grid Geometry for Subsurface Flow and Geothermal Modeling

Abstract: We develop projection-based embedded discrete fracture model (pEDFM) on corner-point grids (CPG) for fluid flow and heat transfer in subsurface geological formations. The coupling between the flow and heat transfer is fully-implicit, to allow for stable simulations, specially in presence of highly contrasting fractures. We define independent CPG-based mesh for matrix rock and all 3D fractures, which allows for capturing geologically complex geometries. The connectivities between the non-neighbouring cells are … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
1
1

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A large class of methods is available for numerical modeling of fracture networks. It may consist of various approaches to the homogenization of fractures network, including Dual-Porosity (Barenblatt, 1960;Warren & Root, 1963) and various MINC models (Karimi-Fard et al, 2006;Pruess & Narasimhan, 1982), or different versions of Embedded Discrete Fracture Models (EDFM) starting from already classic approaches (Hajibeygi et al, 2011;Li & Lee, 2008) to projection-based technique (HosseiniMehr et al, 2020;Ţene et al, 2017). Some hybrid versions combining EDFM with homogenized fractured networks at two different scales also exist (Li & Voskov, 2021).Another class of model is Discrete Fracture Model (DFM), where fracture segments are described as a lower-dimensional object on the mesh.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A large class of methods is available for numerical modeling of fracture networks. It may consist of various approaches to the homogenization of fractures network, including Dual-Porosity (Barenblatt, 1960;Warren & Root, 1963) and various MINC models (Karimi-Fard et al, 2006;Pruess & Narasimhan, 1982), or different versions of Embedded Discrete Fracture Models (EDFM) starting from already classic approaches (Hajibeygi et al, 2011;Li & Lee, 2008) to projection-based technique (HosseiniMehr et al, 2020;Ţene et al, 2017). Some hybrid versions combining EDFM with homogenized fractured networks at two different scales also exist (Li & Voskov, 2021).Another class of model is Discrete Fracture Model (DFM), where fracture segments are described as a lower-dimensional object on the mesh.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A large class of methods is available for numerical modeling of fracture networks. It may consist of various approaches to the homogenization of fractures network, including Dual-Porosity (Barenblatt, 1960;Warren & Root, 1963) and various MINC models (Karimi-Fard et al, 2006;Pruess & Narasimhan, 1982), or different versions of Embedded Discrete Fracture Models (EDFM) starting from already classic approaches (Hajibeygi et al, 2011;Li & Lee, 2008) to projection-based technique (HosseiniMehr et al, 2020;Ţene et al, 2017). Some hybrid versions combining EDFM with homogenized fractured networks at two different scales also exist (Li & Voskov, 2021).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%