2014
DOI: 10.1007/s11229-014-0637-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Projection, symmetry, and natural kinds

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 41 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…How can these results be integrated with the methods for causal discovery in time series? (See e.g., [3,4,21,40,48]. )…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…How can these results be integrated with the methods for causal discovery in time series? (See e.g., [3,4,21,40,48]. )…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Dynamical kinds were first defined in [ 68 ], and have since been applied explicitly to problems of model validation [ 69 ] and causal discovery [ 70 ]. The dynamical kinds theory partitions the space of dynamical systems into equivalence classes—dynamical kinds—on the basis of dynamical symmetry.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The composition of any two dynamical symmetries (by successive intervention on the variables of a system) is itself a dynamical symmetry, and for any given system, its dynamical symmetries typically exhibit nontrivial algebraic structure under composition. It is the collection of symmetries and their structure under composition that characterizes a dynamical kind [ 68 ].…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The third does leave us with a residual problem of the naturalness of kinds: how do we ascertain without already knowing all of the variables involved whether two things are sufficiently similar in their causal structure? This is one of the questions posed by [24] as an "epistemic" problem of natural kinds, and the "dynamical kinds" solution explored in [25][26][27] provides just the sort of test we're looking for.…”
Section: Natural Kinds and The Genesis Of Variablesmentioning
confidence: 99%