1969
DOI: 10.1113/jphysiol.1969.sp008698
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Projection to cerebral cortex of Group I muscle afferents from the cat's hind limb

Abstract: SUMMARY1. Muscle afferent projections from the contralateral hind limb to the postsigmoid gyrus of the cerebral cortex were investigated in cats anaesthetized with chloralose. The evoked potentials were recorded from the cortical surface or from deeper layers by penetrating micro-electrodes. Graded electrical stimulation of the nerves was used.2. Group Ia as well as Ib muscle afferents from the contralateral quadriceps, posterior biceps-semitendinosus, gastrocnemius-soleus and deep peroneal muscles projected t… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

5
30
0

Year Published

1970
1970
2004
2004

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 136 publications
(35 citation statements)
references
References 44 publications
(49 reference statements)
5
30
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Activation of group I inputs, for example, evokes in area 3a a so-called thalamocortical primary response with an initially positive surface wave that reverses polarity in deep layers (Landgren and Silfvenius 1969;Odkvist et al 1975). Iwata et al (1985) described a masseteric-nerve-evoked potential, which reversed to a deep negative component at a depth of 1.5-2.5 mm, in the rostral part of cat area 3a, consistent with our observations.…”
Section: Input Sourcesupporting
confidence: 79%
“…Activation of group I inputs, for example, evokes in area 3a a so-called thalamocortical primary response with an initially positive surface wave that reverses polarity in deep layers (Landgren and Silfvenius 1969;Odkvist et al 1975). Iwata et al (1985) described a masseteric-nerve-evoked potential, which reversed to a deep negative component at a depth of 1.5-2.5 mm, in the rostral part of cat area 3a, consistent with our observations.…”
Section: Input Sourcesupporting
confidence: 79%
“…There is both electrophysiological (Oscarrson & Rosen, 1963;Landgren & Silfvenius, 1969; McIntyre, Proske & Rawson, 1984) and psychophysical (Goodwin, McCloskey & J. G. COLEBATCH AND D. I. McCLOSKEY Matthews, 1972;McCloskey, Ebeling & Goodwin, 1974;Roland & LadegaardPederson, 1977) evidence to support a role for the primary spindle ending and the Golgi tendon organ in kinaesthetic sensations. Our results suggest that this proprioceptive information can be utilized in the volitional control ofthe limbs.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the cat, the cortical receiving area for the spindle input, as deter-420 AREA 3a OF BABOON'S CORTEX mined electrophysiologically (Oscarsson & Rosen, 1963, 1966Landgren & Silfvenius, 1969), does not correspond to area 4, but to area 3a as determined cytoarchitectonically (Hassler & Muhs-Clement, 1964). In the monkey area 3 a lies in the depth of the Rolandic fissure (Roberts & Akert, 1963;Powell & Mountoastle, 1959a).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%