2010
DOI: 10.1007/s00429-010-0281-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Projections from the brain to the spinal cord in the mouse

Abstract: The cells that project from the brain to the spinal cord have previously been mapped in a wide range of mammalian species, but have not been comprehensively studied in the mouse. We have mapped these cells in the mouse using retrograde tracing after large unilateral Fluoro-Gold (FG) and horseradish peroxidase (HRP) injections in the C1 and C2 spinal cord segments. We have identified over 30 cell groups that project to the spinal cord, and have confirmed that the pattern of major projections from the cortex, di… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

17
90
1

Year Published

2011
2011
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

4
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 88 publications
(108 citation statements)
references
References 163 publications
(328 reference statements)
17
90
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The contralateral pRS neurons lay within the same domain of the PRF as the ipsilateral pRS neurons but skewed toward the more lateral, ventral, and rostral region. Thus the distribution of pRS neurons in the neonatal mouse is similar to that reported in the mouse embryo (Auclair et al 1999) and in the adult mouse, demonstrated using different retrograde tracers (Liang et al 2011;Vanderhorst and Ulfhake 2006). A more compre- hensive account of the anatomic organization and relationships of the ipsilateral and contralateral pRS neuron populations is in preparation (M. S. Sivertsen, M.-C. Perreault, and J. C. Glover, unpublished observations).…”
Section: General Overview Of Experimentssupporting
confidence: 79%
“…The contralateral pRS neurons lay within the same domain of the PRF as the ipsilateral pRS neurons but skewed toward the more lateral, ventral, and rostral region. Thus the distribution of pRS neurons in the neonatal mouse is similar to that reported in the mouse embryo (Auclair et al 1999) and in the adult mouse, demonstrated using different retrograde tracers (Liang et al 2011;Vanderhorst and Ulfhake 2006). A more compre- hensive account of the anatomic organization and relationships of the ipsilateral and contralateral pRS neuron populations is in preparation (M. S. Sivertsen, M.-C. Perreault, and J. C. Glover, unpublished observations).…”
Section: General Overview Of Experimentssupporting
confidence: 79%
“…In a separate experiment in which the injection site was centered on the rubrospinal tract caudal to the decussation, labeled fibers were found in the ipsilateral spinal cord, showing that BDA can be taken up by fibers of passage. A further possibility is that rubrospinal fibers that cross the midline in the spinal cord might have been labeled in retrograde tracing experiments (Liang et al 2011), and this label might be transmitted to neurons in the ipsilateral red nucleus (after recrossing in the ventral tegmental decussation).…”
Section: The Rubrospinal Tractmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Anatomic and physiologic studies in species other than mice have shown that the red nucleus plays an important role in locomotion through its connections with the interneurons (Nyberg-Hansen and Brodal 1964;NybergHansen 1966;Warner and Watson 1972;Wild et al 1979;Holstege et al 1988;Küchler et al 2002) and motor neurons in the spinal cord (Holstege 1987;Holstege et al 1988;Küchler et al 2002), but species differences were also observed (Brown 1974;Küchler et al 2002), indicating that rubrospinal neurons may play different roles in different species (Huber et al 1943;Liang et al 2011). Some spinal cord injury research on the impact of spinal cord injury focused on the degeneration and regeneration of the red nucleus neurons and rubrospinal axons (Guízar-Sahagún et al 2005;Harvey et al 2005;Cao et al 2008;Chen et al 2008;Jefferson et al 2011).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In particular, the lumbar injections targeted neurons in the reticular formation, key areas for the control of cardiovascular, somatic motor and pain modulation, as well as consciousness, sleep and habituation. 20 Not all regions predicted to be transduced by the chimeric viruses were found, for example, no neurons were detected in the cerebella nuclei. 21 This may be owing to preferential uptake into neuronal terminals owing to receptor availability, differences in transport efficiency or differences in PGK promoter expression in different neural subtypes.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%