1998
DOI: 10.1007/bfb0055672
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Projective and illumination invariant representation of disjoint shapes

Abstract: We describe a new projectively invariant representation of disjoint contour groups which is suitable for shape-based retrieval from an image database. It consists of simultaneous polar reparametrization of multiple curves where an invariant point is used as the origin. For each ray orientation, a cross-ratio of its intersections with other curves is taken as a value associated to the radius. With respect to other methods this representation is less reliant on single curve properties, both for the construction … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

1999
1999
2006
2006

Publication Types

Select...
3
2

Relationship

2
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Indeed, the shots from which all query images were selected present complex tracking and dollying motion (in addition to pan/tilt/zoom, producing RTS transformations) that would in principle require more complex and computationally time-consuming geometric models for signature extraction (cf. [14]). Furthermore, subject motion causes objects to enter and leave the camera field of view, thereby altering the image content.…”
Section: Experimental Validationmentioning
confidence: 93%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Indeed, the shots from which all query images were selected present complex tracking and dollying motion (in addition to pan/tilt/zoom, producing RTS transformations) that would in principle require more complex and computationally time-consuming geometric models for signature extraction (cf. [14]). Furthermore, subject motion causes objects to enter and leave the camera field of view, thereby altering the image content.…”
Section: Experimental Validationmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…In general, the changes induced by object and camera motion are not restricted to this type of transformation (cf. [14] for an alternative representation that is invariant to affine and projective transformations). However, experimental results from a large database of heterogeneous videos show that it provides a good approximation to invariance under more general, nonrigid transformations.…”
Section: Previous Workmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…In general, the changes induced by object and camera motion are not restricted to this type of transformation (cf. [3] for an alternative representation that is invariant to ane and projective transformations). However, experimental results from a large database of heterogeneous videos show that it provides a good approximation to invariance under more general, non-rigid transformations.…”
Section: Previous Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Indeed, the shots from which all query images where selected present complex tracking and dollying motion (in addition to pan/tilt/zoom producing RTS transformations) that would in principle require more complex and computationally time-consuming geometric models for signature extraction (cf. [3]). Furthermore, subject motion causes objects to enter and leave the camera eld of view, thereby altering the image content.…”
Section: Experimental Validationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Most of the proposed solutions for curve matching are based on differential properties [5,6,7,8,9] or in specific contour models [10,11], which cannot be directly used over low quality images The projective geometry of multiple views of curves has been studied in [12]. Invariant signatures based on rays have been proposed in [13] to retrieve shapes in a database of trademarks. Application of contour matching to visual servoing using snakes is described in [14], where weak perspective estimates, point redistribution, and projective correction steps are iterated until convergence.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%